2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5066445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

doFORC tool for calculating first-order reversal curve diagrams of noisy scattered data

Abstract: First-order reversal curves (FORC) diagram method is one of the most successful characterization techniques used to characterize complex hysteretic phenomena not only in magnetism, but also in other areas of science like in ferroelectricity, geology, archeology, light-induced and pressure hysteresis in spin-transition materials, etc. Because the definition of the FORC diagram involves a second-order derivative, the main problem in their numerical calculation is that the derivative of a function for which only … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome these shortcomings, one solution is to take only one derivative from the FORC data to calculate the switching field distributions [36][37][38][39]. In this approach, the switching field distributions are functions of both H and H r fields leading to 2D heat-maps that inherently share the complex data interpretation and analysis of the FORC method [40][41][42]. To further suppress these limitations, we propose to decompose the irreversible and reversible switching fields (ISF and RSF, respectively) and only investigate the ISF distributions at the H=H r and H=0, figure 1(a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome these shortcomings, one solution is to take only one derivative from the FORC data to calculate the switching field distributions [36][37][38][39]. In this approach, the switching field distributions are functions of both H and H r fields leading to 2D heat-maps that inherently share the complex data interpretation and analysis of the FORC method [40][41][42]. To further suppress these limitations, we propose to decompose the irreversible and reversible switching fields (ISF and RSF, respectively) and only investigate the ISF distributions at the H=H r and H=0, figure 1(a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any moment measurement, standard or fast, such as MOKE-FORC [25,45] and AC FORC methods [37,46,47], can be used to measure these 5 points. In addition, complex data processing and smoothing are not required [27,[40][41][42]48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes ISFD even more ideal for real-time diagnosis and quality control. Specifically, these signatures do not require massive data processing as required by the conventional FORC analysis [43][44][45][46] . For example, conventional FORC analysis typically requires 20-100 curves with 20-100 points each (= 400 to 10,000 points).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, FORC usually requires very long measurement times, which is not efficient for biomedical applications or industrial quality control [40][41][42] . Second, smoothing is required for data processing and can induce spurious features [43][44][45][46] . Third, taking two derivatives amplifies noise that can conceal the real features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another example, Zamani Kouhpanji reported on the application of the FORC technique for demultiplexing the magnetic nanowires embedded inside the biological species [143]. Regardless of the complex data processing of the FORC [147][148][149], this technique is significantly slower than the other magnetic characterization techniques because it requires scanning the whole area of the hysteresis loop to a detailed analysis [107,108,129]. In this direction, several works have been done to enhance the measurements by introducing modifications to the standard protocol of the FORC technique.…”
Section: First-order Reversal Curve (Forc)mentioning
confidence: 99%