1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1997.300863.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dog allergy: understanding our 'best friend'?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although homes without dogs have decreased antigen levels compared to homes with dogs (14), many other studies suggest that complete avoidance of dog antigen may not be possible (17). In this study most people had dogs; the level of antigen was also high in people without dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although homes without dogs have decreased antigen levels compared to homes with dogs (14), many other studies suggest that complete avoidance of dog antigen may not be possible (17). In this study most people had dogs; the level of antigen was also high in people without dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…It has been suggested that the relatively low incidence of contact allergies in dogs compared to humans is due to protection of the skin by the coat (6,9,11,18). Yet, there are no scientific data to substantiate this claim (17). Contact hypersensitivity in dogs was confirmed to the synthetic textiles and cement and the following substances were also documented: thiuram mix, cobalt chloride, nickel sulphate, quinoline mix, colophony, black rubber mix, ethylenediamine, primin and wood tar (15,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations