Doing change and continuity: age identity and the micro–macro divide

Abstract

This paper is a study of the discursive management of notions of change and continuity in interview talk. It presents selected short empirical examples from interviews with 22 Finnish baby-boomers, and discusses the methodological and theoretical issues that arise. Following a review of the major approaches to the study of age identity, the analytic intersection between qualitative gerontology and discursive psychology is explored. The analysis identifies how the frequent use of a ‘provisional continuity device’ enables speakers simultaneously both to acknowledge and to distance themselves from factual notions of physical or psychological lifespan change. The key methodological argument is that the discursive analysis of age-in-interaction cannot necessarily be achieved through the myopic micro-study of discursive strategies, but rather two suggestions are made. First, it is argued that analytically-anchored and rigorous discursive gerontology that both systematically draws on and contributes to the broad field of discursive research provides a means by which to test empirically post-modern conceptualisations of age identity. Second, it is suggested that analyses of age-talk in everyday and institutional settings provide an analytical and theoretical middle-ground between the macroversusmicro or ‘microfication’ debate in gerontology.

Emergence of entrepreneurial behaviour: The role of age-based self-image

“…Based on prior research, it would be plausible to argue that the effect of age-based self-image is not independent of the person's chronological age. Age-based self-image is linked to cultural and factual markers of age as a chronological category (Nikander, 2009) Table 3). According to the F-test of change in model fit, the added interaction does not improve the model (F 6, 653 = .75, n.s.).…”

Macro- and micro-level predictors of age categorization: results from the European Social Survey

“…Despite the numerous definitions of age, chronological age is most often used to categorize individuals as young versus old (Nikander 2009). Nevertheless, chronological age is not always associated with other markers of aging, such as disability, marital status, retirement status, living arrangement, or subjective age (Bowling et al 2005).…”

Representational Practices in Demands Driven Development of Public Sector

“…People are always already in assemblage with the world" Many of these researchers have extended the argument also to other identity formations such as sexuality [2,3], class [19], ethnicity [7], religion [ibid. ], and age [16]. This kind of research emphasizes how these practices are fundamentally entangled, and how they both enable and constrain specific subject formations.…”