2018
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality

Abstract: This is the published version of a paper published in Critical Discourse Studies.Citation for the original published paper (version of record):Ledin, P., Machin, D. (2018) Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: From metafunctions to materiality In Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) and in other linguistics oriented scholarly journals we now see more research which draws upon multimodality as part of carrying out analyses of how texts make meaning, in order to draw out the ideologies which they c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained data also go in line with previous studies on coordination of textual and visual tools in multimodal discourse (Ledin & Machin, 2019).…”
Section: Multimodal Discourse On Brics From National Mass Media Outsisupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The obtained data also go in line with previous studies on coordination of textual and visual tools in multimodal discourse (Ledin & Machin, 2019).…”
Section: Multimodal Discourse On Brics From National Mass Media Outsisupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, items that only share some degree of similarity were not combined for reasons of allowing a wider space for diverse reader interpretations. For instance, ‘multimodal discourse analysis’ and ‘multimodal social semiotic (approach)’ were not coded into one keyword given that some researchers undertake different approaches to multimodal analysis (see intense debate on this matter in Bateman, 2019; Caple, 2019; Ledin and Machin, 2019a, 2019b; O’Halloran et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contextual and ideological effects analysed are compatible with the preferred reading suggested by the multimodal analysis. This point should be taken into consideration as part of the on-going discussions regarding the nature and principles of the growing field of multimodality (Bateman 2018;Ledin and Machin 2018b;O'Halloran et al 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%