2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Heideggerian hermeneutic research: A discussion paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conrad (1990) stated that ''While an N of 1 raises obvious problems of generalisability and potential idiosyncrasy, this strategy may be quite appropriate for some fine-textured case analysis'' (p. 1258). The hermeneutic intent of this paper is not to identify generalisable truths but rather to draw on the participant's reflections as a spring board to 'thinking' (Smythe, Ironside, Sims, Swenson, & Spence, 2008). One person whose involvement has spannned time and different sports brings the advantage of being able to appreciate the shapers of change and difference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conrad (1990) stated that ''While an N of 1 raises obvious problems of generalisability and potential idiosyncrasy, this strategy may be quite appropriate for some fine-textured case analysis'' (p. 1258). The hermeneutic intent of this paper is not to identify generalisable truths but rather to draw on the participant's reflections as a spring board to 'thinking' (Smythe, Ironside, Sims, Swenson, & Spence, 2008). One person whose involvement has spannned time and different sports brings the advantage of being able to appreciate the shapers of change and difference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodology which was described by Cohen, Kahn and Steeves (2000) and Smythe et al (2008) was applied to the data. The procedure involves a cycle of reading, writing, re-reading and re-writing and reflection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this spirit, I drew on the insights and lessons of several phenomenological researchers regarding research quality (Benner, 1994b;Smythe, Ironside, Sims, Swenson, & Spence, 2008; and the contributions of other qualitative research scholars (Sandelowski, 1993 to consider the degree of methodological adherence to the phenomenological tradition when considering how to attend to the quality of my work. I propose five criteria by which to judge the quality of the research: comprehensiveness of the data; transparency of the research process; the phenomenological nod; a critically reflexive lens; and the fruitfulness of the findings.…”
Section: Embodied Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%