2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain adaptation for Alzheimer's disease diagnostics

Abstract: With the increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease, research focuses on the early computer-aided diagnosis of dementia with the goal to understand the disease process, determine risk and preserving factors, and explore preventive therapies. By now, large amounts of data from multi-site studies have been made available for developing, training, and evaluating automated classifiers. Yet, their translation to the clinic remains challenging, in part due to their limited generalizability across different dataset… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that when jointly learning a deep PointNet, it is able to learn a powerful global descriptor of hippocampus shape that augments clinical features for MCIto-AD progression. Moreover, our results confirm that hippocampus volume is a useful independent predictor that cannot be fully captured by anatomical shape alone, as described previously [50].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This shows that when jointly learning a deep PointNet, it is able to learn a powerful global descriptor of hippocampus shape that augments clinical features for MCIto-AD progression. Moreover, our results confirm that hippocampus volume is a useful independent predictor that cannot be fully captured by anatomical shape alone, as described previously [50].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As the classifier had to choose from three outcomes the performance of baseline classifier is 33% unlike the binary classifier with baseline performance of 50%. Our results of three label classifier were comparable with existing studies of three label classification [60,61]. The best algorithm, developed by Sørensen et al, achieved an accuracy of 63% in the 2014 Dementia challenge [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In ADNI, which has an optimized MPRAGE imaging protocol across all sites [11], the intrasubject variability of compartment volumes for scans on different scanners was roughly 10 times higher than repeated scans on the same scanner [13]. Similarly, [25] reported a drop in accuracy when training and testing on different datasets.…”
Section: Name That Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%