2020
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1711239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain adaptation for unsupervised change detection of multisensor multitemporal remote-sensing images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Farahani et al [126] used a technique based on auto-encoder, which was a deep analysis method used to achieve fused features of SAR, "optical" to benefit from complementary information, to align multi-temporal images by a reduction in spectral and radiometric differences, and made multi-temporal features more similar, for better accuracy in CD.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Unsupervised Methods For Sar Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farahani et al [126] used a technique based on auto-encoder, which was a deep analysis method used to achieve fused features of SAR, "optical" to benefit from complementary information, to align multi-temporal images by a reduction in spectral and radiometric differences, and made multi-temporal features more similar, for better accuracy in CD.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Unsupervised Methods For Sar Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving a multitemporal analysis over several decades requires overcoming numerous technical challenges, such as rectifying the differences between multiple sensors across different time periods, or addressing heterogeneous data quality and availability due to various factors, notably cloud cover [25,26]. Recent cloud computing and big data approaches [27,28] have brought new solutions to such problems, allowing researchers to assemble and process very large datasets composed of collections of remote sensing images and other ancillary data [29,30], thus potentially dramatically improving the performances of image classification and LULC analyses [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e bolt information in the picture is removed to obtain the track fastener clip subpicture, so as to avoid the interference of the bolt subgraph feature on the track fastener defect detection. Secondly, AE [27,28] and RBM [29,30] are used to extract clip subimage features of track fastener, because AE focuses on edge feature for extracting subimage features of track fastener clip [31], while RBM focuses on texture feature [32,33]. Considering that the edge feature is advantageous for detecting the state of track fastener loss and track fastener clip loosening, the texture feature is advantageous for detecting the broken state of the track fastener clip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%