2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11101153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Adversarial Neural Networks for Large-Scale Land Cover Classification

Abstract: Learning classification models require sufficiently labeled training samples, however, collecting labeled samples for every new problem is time-consuming and costly. An alternative approach is to transfer knowledge from one problem to another, which is called transfer learning. Domain adaptation (DA) is a type of transfer learning that aims to find a new latent space where the domain discrepancy between the source and the target domain is negligible. In this work, we propose an unsupervised DA technique called… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their experimental settings are not very challenging because the selected source and target domain area are very close, and there are only small feature differences between the two domains. Bejiga et al [38] adopted a promising adversarial training framework; however, their method could be improved by using GAN loss [35] instead of gradient reversal layer because [34] reported better results than [33]. Rostami et al [39] incorporated Sliced Wasserstein Distance (SWD) [40] with the classic distribution-matching method to deal with feature differences between electro-optical (EO) and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images.…”
Section: Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their experimental settings are not very challenging because the selected source and target domain area are very close, and there are only small feature differences between the two domains. Bejiga et al [38] adopted a promising adversarial training framework; however, their method could be improved by using GAN loss [35] instead of gradient reversal layer because [34] reported better results than [33]. Rostami et al [39] incorporated Sliced Wasserstein Distance (SWD) [40] with the classic distribution-matching method to deal with feature differences between electro-optical (EO) and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images.…”
Section: Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs are a type of deep learning method that use convolutional multiplication based on artificial neural networks [37]. Recently, CNN have been widely used in land cover classification, showing remarkable performance [18,19,32,33,[38][39][40][41]. Typical CNNs are composed of convolutional layers, pooling layers, and fully connected layers.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But such methods require large, labeled datasets for training, which is not always feasible. However, recent studies such as Rostami et al [22] and Bejiga et al [23] provide an alternative approach to building training datasets using transfer learning methodologies that takes advantage of knowledge from existing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%