2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain decomposition method for dynamic faulting under slip-dependent friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic simulations were performed on the above conÿguration, using a Newmark ÿnite di erence scheme and a domain decomposition method (see Reference [22] for a detailed description). Such simulations can be used to check the validity of the computed value of ÿ 0 (found with 2 = 0).…”
Section: Spectral Analysis Vs Time Evolution On Two Parallel Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic simulations were performed on the above conÿguration, using a Newmark ÿnite di erence scheme and a domain decomposition method (see Reference [22] for a detailed description). Such simulations can be used to check the validity of the computed value of ÿ 0 (found with 2 = 0).…”
Section: Spectral Analysis Vs Time Evolution On Two Parallel Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a finite difference scheme was proposed in [29], for the anti-plane (2D, mode III) problem, and developed thereafter in [18,19] for the in-plane (2D, mode II) and 3D problems, but the use of a finite difference method restricts the applications on planar fault geometries. Further references on earthquake simulations can be bound for instance in [6]. We shall mention here a few recent works that constitute effective efforts to model realistic fault geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are much fewer finite element models [1,5,6,36] in the field of earthquake rupture simulation, because they are more difficult to implement than finite differences, and because low order schemes can lead to undesirable numerical dissipation. However, finite element methods have numerous advantages compared with finite differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations