2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4906101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain size correlated magnetic properties and electrical impedance of size dependent nickel ferrite nanoparticles

Abstract: We report here the investigations on the size dependent variation of magnetic properties of nickel ferrite nanoparticles. Nickel ferrite nanoparticles of different sizes (14 to 22 nm) were prepared by the sol-gel route at different annealing temperatures. They are characterized by TGA-DTA, XRD, SEM, TEM and Raman spectroscopy techniques for the confirmation of the temperature of phase formation, thermal stability, crystallinity, morphology and structural status of the nickel ferrite nanoparticles. The magnetiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since ball milling induces more surface defects into the system, increased separation between the core results in the reduced magnetic interaction among the nanoparticle core, thereby resulting in the reduction of net magnetization, and increased coercivity. It is interesting to note that the theoretical value of the shell thickness estimated for LB3SMO-48 sample from the magnetization data (t S = 3.8 nm) is in good agreement Further, from the magnetization plots, the magnetic domain size can be estimated using the relation [60], where T = temperature, ρ = density of LB3SMO (≈10.028 g/ cm 3 ), dM/dH is the value of the slope of M-H curve at H = 0, k B = Boltzmann constant, and M S = saturation magnetization. The values of the domain size thus obtained are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Isothermal Magnetization Studies (M Vs H)supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Since ball milling induces more surface defects into the system, increased separation between the core results in the reduced magnetic interaction among the nanoparticle core, thereby resulting in the reduction of net magnetization, and increased coercivity. It is interesting to note that the theoretical value of the shell thickness estimated for LB3SMO-48 sample from the magnetization data (t S = 3.8 nm) is in good agreement Further, from the magnetization plots, the magnetic domain size can be estimated using the relation [60], where T = temperature, ρ = density of LB3SMO (≈10.028 g/ cm 3 ), dM/dH is the value of the slope of M-H curve at H = 0, k B = Boltzmann constant, and M S = saturation magnetization. The values of the domain size thus obtained are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Isothermal Magnetization Studies (M Vs H)supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the early 16th century, Schneeberg (Germany) was the main source of cobalt for European glass and ceramics, which was exported as zaffre. Zaffre resulted from the calcination of a mineral cobalt ore, such as cobaltite (CoAsS), erythrite (Co 3 (AsO 4 ) 2 )·8H 2 O or skutterudite (Co, Ni, Fe)As 3 , or, according to different references, it was the result of the calcination of the cobalt ore mixed with sand (Gratuze et al, 1996; Zucchiatti et al, 2006; Machado & Vilarigues, 2016). The cobalt compound present in these blue glazes includes Co–Ni–Fe–olivines and Co–Ni–ferrites (spinels) as neoformation compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison with the experimental investigations of the magnetic properties, the micromagnetic simulation software OOMMF (Object-Oriented MicroMagnetic Framework) was used [67], applying finite differences for meshing and solving the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation of motion [68]. The following material parameters were chosen for Fe 3 O 4 (Fe 2 O 3 /NiO) according to typical literature values [69][70][71][72][73]: M S,magnetite = 500 × 10 3 A/m (M S,nickel-ferrite = 270 × 10 3 A/m), exchange constant A magnetite = 12 × 10 −12 J/m (A nickel-ferrite = 12 × 10 −12 J/m), magneto-crystalline anisotropy constant K 1,magnetite = 11 × 10 3 J/m 3 (K 1,nickel-ferrite = −6.9 × 10 3 J/m 3 ). Since the electrospinning process can be expected to produce arbitrarily oriented crystallographic orientations of the nanoparticles, random orientations of the simulated grains of 5 nm diameter were chosen.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%