1989
DOI: 10.1080/00150198908217583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain structure and phase boundaries in ferroelastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which determines the intersection surface of two the third order surfaces, described by b ijk (S + 1 ) (3) and b ijk (S ± 4 ) (3) tensors of two neighbouring OS's and therefore should define the piezoelectric walls orientation [12]. The substitution of the SPCT's values gives:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which determines the intersection surface of two the third order surfaces, described by b ijk (S + 1 ) (3) and b ijk (S ± 4 ) (3) tensors of two neighbouring OS's and therefore should define the piezoelectric walls orientation [12]. The substitution of the SPCT's values gives:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction energy of ferroelastic domains with the external mechanical stress is well described by thermodynamical potential energy density A@ in each domain by (Dudnik and Shuvalov, 1989):…”
Section: Domain Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successive transitions to ferroelastic phases lead to either monoclinic (C2/m or C2/c) or triclinic (P 1) systems and are evidenced by anomalies in the Raman spectra [7,8], a dielectric susceptibility [6], X-ray studies [9], heat capacity measurements [10], electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [11][12][13] and optical microscopy studies [14][15][16]. Substantial differences in temperatures of the trigonalto-monoclinic phase transitions observed in TDM correlate with the A þ alkali ion atomic number [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%