2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.024424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain wall dynamics in easy-cone magnets

Abstract: We theoretically and numerically investigate magnetic domain wall dynamics in a nanowire of easy-cone magnet. The easy-cone domain wall exhibits several distinguishing dynamic features in comparison to the easy-axis domain wall. The features of easy-cone domain wall are related to the generation of additional chiral spin textures due to the domain wall precession, which is common for various driving sources such as magnetic fields and spin-transfer torques.The unique easy-cone domain wall dynamics could enrich… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the microstrain variation shown in figure 5. The diffraction peak broadens with the increase of annealing time, which indicates that the tissue is gradually refined [11] , which is consistent with the results of metallographic tissue analysis. However, the diffraction peak at 75 min was about 44°, which was significantly shifted compared to the diffraction peaks of the first four samples (about 43°), probably due to the change in grain orientation at 75 min, which shifted the diffraction peak and affected the change in internal residual magnetism, resulting in an increase in residual magnetism.…”
Section: Xrd and Microstrain At Different Annealing Timessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…with the microstrain variation shown in figure 5. The diffraction peak broadens with the increase of annealing time, which indicates that the tissue is gradually refined [11] , which is consistent with the results of metallographic tissue analysis. However, the diffraction peak at 75 min was about 44°, which was significantly shifted compared to the diffraction peaks of the first four samples (about 43°), probably due to the change in grain orientation at 75 min, which shifted the diffraction peak and affected the change in internal residual magnetism, resulting in an increase in residual magnetism.…”
Section: Xrd and Microstrain At Different Annealing Timessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…and K s is the surface anisotropy energy. Samples with t Pd = 10.35 and 12.6 nm from the Ta-series existed in the easy-cone state 39,40 , the formation of which requires the implementation of the following conditions: K eff < 0, K 2 > 0, and K 2 > À 1 2 K eff . Since we know the cone state angle θ = 45°, the K 2 value can be calculated using the relation…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Ks is the surface anisotropy energy. Samples with tPd = 10.35 and 12.6 nm from the Ta-series possessed the easy-cone state 39,40 , the formation of which requires the implementation of the following conditions: Keff <0, K2 >0, and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides improved functionalities of various spintronics devices, such as low-power operation of spin-transfer torque (STT) MRAMs [4][5][6] and zerofield precession of STT oscillators 7 . Moreover, it hosts spin superfluids associated with spontaneous breaking of U(1) spin-rotational symmetry 8,9 and allows unique easy-cone domain wall dynamics 10 . The existence of the easy-cone state was experimentally verified in various layered structures 6,11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%