1971
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1971.1067097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain-wall velocity, mobility, and mean-free-path in permalloy films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5.13) and (5.14) between the origin and the data point measured at the highest field. These values were much closer to the ones previously observed in films [492] and also to the ones predicted by theory [493]. The results were regarded as a proof that the operational speed of potential spintronic devices involving DW motion in magnetic nanostructures would not be affected by structural confinement.…”
Section: Domain Wall Dynamics In 1d Metallic Nanostructuressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(5.13) and (5.14) between the origin and the data point measured at the highest field. These values were much closer to the ones previously observed in films [492] and also to the ones predicted by theory [493]. The results were regarded as a proof that the operational speed of potential spintronic devices involving DW motion in magnetic nanostructures would not be affected by structural confinement.…”
Section: Domain Wall Dynamics In 1d Metallic Nanostructuressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mobility of a symmetric Bloch wall is 5 m/s.Oe close to the mobility value, 6.7 m/s Oe, measured experimentally by Konichi for a wall structure in a 67 nm thick Permalloy film. 1 However, the simulated value is half the expected theoretical mobility of 9.6 m/s Oe calculated from the theoretical mobility 6 of a moving 180°Bloch wall in an infinitely thick material. The presence of demagnetizing effects arising from the surfaces ought to slow a Bloch wall as shown by the simulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Three distinct values of wall mobility were found at 150, 670, and 31 nm. 1 Several simulations have shown that in this range of thickness, the wall structure is a C-shaped wall, 2,3 a symmetric Bloch wall 4 or a Néel wall, respectively. Figure 1 shows the magnetization vector in an x-z cross section normal to the wall plane (y-z) for ͑a͒ a 160-nm-thick C-shaped ͑asymmetric Bloch͒ wall and ͑b͒ an 80-nm-thick symmetric Bloch wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 For Permalloy thin-films ͑compositions around Ni 80 Fe 20 ͒ the magnetization process typically involves nucleation and propagation of domain walls throughout the film. 4 The domain wall propagation velocity in Permalloy thin-films has been determined experimentally by several groups [4][5][6][7] and it was shown that the velocity increases monotonically with field and the field dependence of the wall velocity may be divided into two regimes: a high-field regime controlled by gyromagnetic damping; and a low-field regime where thermally activated depinning contributes to the propagation time. In contrast, theoretical studies 8,9 and simulations 10,11 have shown that in the absence of pinning the domain wall velocity can increase approximately linearly with field up to a critical field beyond which the domain wall structure is no longer stable; in this case both the wall structure and wall motion become complex including periods of retrograde motion which has been termed Walker breakdown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%