Domestic and international migration in the Russian Far East in the mid-19th-early 21st century

Мищук, Светлана

doi:10.1134/s2079970513040084

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The labor produc tivity of Chinese leaseholders was higher than that of local inhabitants, which was explained by the high efficiency of Chinese gardening in comparison to Rus sian land cultivation methods. A widespread practice was extraction by Russian peasants of profit owing to the difference between the sum they obtained from Chinese land renters (RUR 5.63) and the sum of the rent paid to the treasury or individuals (RUR 2.5) [6]. At present, for rents of RUR 300-100/ha per year paid by Russian farmers for land, the sum obtained for unofficial subletting (based on a cooperation agree ment) can reach RUR 2000-3000 or more 2 .…”

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Analysis of materials from the Department of Ros sel'khoznadzor (Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance) on Primorskii, Khar barovsk, and Transbaikal krais; Sakhalin and Amur oblasts; and the Jewish Autonomous Oblast (JAO) has shown that in all regions that invite Chinese migrants, violations of land use norms and phytosanitory moni toring (pollution of agricultural land with wastes, vio lations of the rules of pesticide usage, entry of excess chemical substances into the soil, destruction of fertile topsoil, and the import and use of uncertified seeds) have been recorded. Owing to violations of land legis lation in Amur oblast since 2013, a ban has been intro duced on using Chinese migrants for agriculture 6 . The labor resource requirements are compensated in the oblast by citizens from the CIS and North Korea.…”

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sig nificant economic damage from violations at firms with foreign capital have been recorded. The greatest damage (RUR 27.19 mln) in 2011 was by LLC Vladimiro Petrovskoe (Khankaiskii District of Pri morskii krai) 7 ; in 2013 (RUR 198 mln), LLC Lunna (Primorskii krai) 8 ; in 2015, damages at the Churki 6 In 2013 in Irkutsk oblast, a zero quota on using Chinese laborers for regional agriculture was introduced, with the exception of highly qualified specialists. wildlife preserve in the JAO amounted to RUR 29 mln 9 .…”

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Russian–Chinese agricultural cooperation in the Russian Far East

Мищук

2016

Reg. Res. Russ.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study analyzes the role of the Chinese factor in developing the agriculture of the southern regions of the Russian Far East. The role of Chinese labor migrants, business activity with Chinese capital, the state of agriculture, and socioeconomic development of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast are considered in the most detail. Insufficient official statistics and reported data determine the study's wide use of materials from federal agencies, regional executive authorities, various Internet sites, and interviews and information collected by the author during field research. It is shown that the involvement of Chinese labor migrants in agriculture facilitates the development and use of land; however, it has an insignificant effect on the regional economy, intensifies administrative problems of local agricultural producers, sharpens environmental prob lems, and indirectly decreases the quality of life of the population in the countryside. The basis for stabilizing the agricultural situation is the clear position of the authorities in achieving long term branch indices taking into account the support of local agricultural producers and regular monitoring of foreign business activity.

show abstract

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Russian–Chinese agricultural cooperation in the Russian Far East

Мищук

2016

Reg. Res. Russ.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Relying on the rapid development of industrialization, the urbanization development of eastern Russia went through with military and administrative functions, which was from west to east developing, from the center to around radiating [ 4 – 6 ]. Mishchuk reviewed the urbanization immigrants characteristics in the Far East Federal District [ 7 ], including the European immigrants settling in the Far East Federal District, the forced and voluntary immigrants to the Far East Federal District, and the reverse migration flow formation in the Far East Federal District. (2) Urbanization development problems discussion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of coordinated development of urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia—Perspectives from the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the background of “the Belt and Road” and “the economic corridor of China, Mongolia and Russia” initiatives, it has great value to study the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the coordinated development between the urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia (the Siberian Federal District and the Far East Federal District). In this paper, we studied the urbanization development level, eco-environment development level, and their coupling coordinated development degree during 2005–2018 in the eastern Russia from the perspectives of the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis. First, combining with the Population-Economic-Sociology and Pressure-State-Response models, the urbanization development level and eco-environment development level were calculated by the comprehensive weighting method of entropy weight and variation coefficient for eastern Russia. Second, the coupling coordinated development degree of the urbanization development level and eco-environment development level was measured by the coupling coordination model for eastern Russia. Finally, the spatial differentiation of the urbanization development level, the eco-environment development level and their coupling coordinated development degree was performed respectively by the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis using ArcGIS. The results are as following. First, the comprehensive urbanization development level of eastern Russia has increased from 2005 to 2018, and the economic urbanization is the main factor that affects the urbanization development in eastern Russia. The comprehensive eco-environment development level of eastern Russia has decreased from 2005 to 2018, and the eco-environment pressure is the main factor that affects the eco-environment development in eastern Russia. The coupling coordination degree of the urbanization development and eco-environment development has increased from 2005 to 2018. However, it is still in the uncoordinated stage. Second, from 2005 to 2018, the urbanization development level of the Siberian Federal District is higher than that of the Far East Federal District. The eco-environment development level of the Siberian Federal District is balanced to that of the Far East Federal District. The coupling coordination degree of the Siberian Federal District is higher than that of the Far East Federal District. Among the Siberian and Far East Federal Districts, most of the federal subjects belong to the uncoordinated stage of the urbanization development and the eco-environment development. Third, the urbanization development level, the eco-environment development level, and their coupling coordinated development level are all spatially imbalanced in the eastern Russia, which show the “High West, Low East” and “High Center, Low North and Low South” spatial pattern from the perspectives of the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis. The areas with high levels are concentrated in the Novosibirsk Region, Altay Territory, Kemerovo Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, and Irkutsk Region. The areas with low ones are mostly in the Republic of Altay and Chukotka Autonomous Area. Finally, we suggest policies and strategies that can boost the growth and development of the urbanization and the eco-environment in the Sino-Russian border areas.

show abstract

“…And relying on the rapid development of industrialization, the urbanization development of eastern Russia went through a urbanization road from west to east developing, from the center to around radiating, with military and administrative functions (Feng, 2014;Gao, 2014;Глушкова, 2004). Mishchuk (2013) reviewed the urbanization characteristics of immigrants in the Far East Federal District, including the reasons and characteristics of European immigrants settling in the Far East Federal District, the dynamics of forced and voluntary immigrants in the Far East Federal District, and the reasons for the formation of reverse migration flow in the Far East Federal District. (2) Discussion of urbanization development problems.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of coordinated development of urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia

Chu

Zhang

Xiang-li

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the background of “the Belt and Road” and “the economic corridor of China, Mongolia and Russia” initiatives, it is of great significance to study the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the coordinated development between the urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia (the Siberian Federal District and the Far East Federal District). This paper studied the urbanization development level, eco-environment development level, and their coupling coordinated development degree during 2005-2018 in the eastern Russia from the perspectives of the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis. First, combining with the Population-Economic-Sociology and Pressure-State-Response models, the paper constructed the index systems to evaluate the urbanization development level and eco-environment development level in eastern Russia. Second, based on the comprehensive weighting method of entropy weight and variation coefficient, this paper calculated the urbanization development level and eco-environment development level in eastern Russia. Third, the paper used the coupling coordination model to measure the coupling coordinated development degree of the urbanization development level and eco-environment development level in eastern Russia. Finally, the spatial differentiation of the urbanization development level, the eco-environment development level and their coupling coordinated development degree was performed respectively by the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis using ArcGIS. The results are as following. First, the comprehensive urbanization development level of eastern Russia has increased from 2005 to 2018, and the urbanization level of the economic aspect is the main factor that affects the urbanization development of eastern Russia. The comprehensive eco-environment development level of eastern Russia has decreased from 2005 to 2018, and the eco-environment pressure is the main factor that affects the eco-environment development of eastern Russia. The coupling coordination degree of the urbanization development and eco-environment development has increased from 2005 to 2018, but it is still in the uncoordinated stage. Second, from 2005 to 2018, the urbanization development level of the Siberian Federal District is higher than that of the Far East Federal District. The eco-environment development level of the Siberian Federal District is balanced to that of the Far East Federal District. The coupling coordination degree of the urbanization development and eco-environment development in the Siberian Federal District is higher than that in the Far East Federal District. Among the Siberian Federal District and the Far East Federal District, most of the federal subjects belong to the uncoordinated stage of the urbanization development and the eco-environment development. Third, the urbanization development level, the eco-environment development level, and their coupling coordinated development level are all spatially imbalanced in the eastern Russia, which show the “High West, Low East” and “High Center, Low North and South” spatial pattern from the perspectives of the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis. The areas with high levels are concentrated in the Novosibirsk Region, Altay Territory, Kemerovo Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, and Irkutsk Region. The areas with low ones are mostly in the Republic of Altay and Chukotka Autonomous Area. Finally, we suggest policies and strategies that can boost the growth and development of the urbanization and the eco-environment in the Sino-Russian border areas, such as: promoting the division and cooperation of industries, implementing the division and cooperation of energy projects, developing diversified tourism resources and products, accelerating the transformation of infrastructure, promoting the construction of the economic cooperation zone, and strengthening the protection and management of ecological environment, etc.

show abstract

Domestic and international migration in the Russian Far East in the mid-19th-early 21st century

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Russian–Chinese agricultural cooperation in the Russian Far East

Russian–Chinese agricultural cooperation in the Russian Far East

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of coordinated development of urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia—Perspectives from the 3D global trend and 2D plane analysis

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of coordinated development of urbanization and ecological environment in eastern Russia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About