Social Movement Dynamics 2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315609546-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestic Loops and Deleveraging Hooks: Transnational Social Movements and the Politics of Scale Shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has long been recognised by political geographers, who argue that space and scale are not natural, but socially and politically constructed, and the outcome of power struggles between competing social forces (Massey, 1992;Agnew, 1994;Cox, 1998;Gough, 2004). This 'politics of scale' framework has been recently used to examine region building by the 'Pink Tide' of leftist governments in Latin America, examining the ways in which transnational social forces operating across regional organizations have sought to construct a 'counterhegemonic' regionalism to challenge the neoliberal world order (Muhr, 2013(Muhr, , 2017(Muhr, , 2019(Muhr, , 2016Spalding, 2015;Perrotta, 2016). This article builds on these analyses to account for the evolving nature of Mercosur, highlighting how its different phases reflected the political projects of competing coalitions of social forces, and how the politics of scale associated with attempts to lock in governance at the regional level led to Mercosur's politicization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has long been recognised by political geographers, who argue that space and scale are not natural, but socially and politically constructed, and the outcome of power struggles between competing social forces (Massey, 1992;Agnew, 1994;Cox, 1998;Gough, 2004). This 'politics of scale' framework has been recently used to examine region building by the 'Pink Tide' of leftist governments in Latin America, examining the ways in which transnational social forces operating across regional organizations have sought to construct a 'counterhegemonic' regionalism to challenge the neoliberal world order (Muhr, 2013(Muhr, , 2017(Muhr, , 2019(Muhr, , 2016Spalding, 2015;Perrotta, 2016). This article builds on these analyses to account for the evolving nature of Mercosur, highlighting how its different phases reflected the political projects of competing coalitions of social forces, and how the politics of scale associated with attempts to lock in governance at the regional level led to Mercosur's politicization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the civil war in El Salvador (1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992), the country reformed its markets under the Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA) government in the 1990s, as well as its mining law in 1996 11 that permitted an investor friendly environment with up to 3% 12 royalties (Spalding 2016 (Spalding 2016, 2; see also : Spalding 2014b: Spalding , 2015aBroad and Cavanagh 2015).…”
Section: Extractivism and Mobilization In Central Americamentioning
confidence: 99%