1996
DOI: 10.1139/f96-090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behaviour and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
144
3
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
144
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased levels of GH have also proven to have an effect on behavior. Thus, it has been shown that exogenous GH increases appetite and dominance in juvenile rainbow trout [Johnsson and Björnsson, 1994] as well as decreasing antipredator behavior [Johnsson et al, 1996].…”
Section: To What Extent Are Divergent Stress Coping Styles An Effect mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased levels of GH have also proven to have an effect on behavior. Thus, it has been shown that exogenous GH increases appetite and dominance in juvenile rainbow trout [Johnsson and Björnsson, 1994] as well as decreasing antipredator behavior [Johnsson et al, 1996].…”
Section: To What Extent Are Divergent Stress Coping Styles An Effect mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that naïve cod-conditioned gobies are more fearless, as they have had limited experience of cod as a stationary predator (Svåsand 1990). Earlier studies have shown that predator-naïve fish are more riskprone than wild fish (Johnsson et al 1996), and that prey learn to use different anti-predator behaviours/ strategies for different predators (e.g. Lima & Dill 1990, Lima 1992, Sih et al 1998).…”
Section: Visual and Chemical Predator Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field studies have been undertaken of the reproductive behaviour and success of escapees and their hybrids (Fleming et al 2000;McGinnity et al 2003), and laboratory studies show a greater willingness of domestic fishes to accept risk to access food-rich habitats (e.g. Johnsson & Abrahams 1991;Johnsson et al 1996). However, no large-scale field experiments yet exist that directly quantify the relative survivorship of wild and domestic strains and the ecological conditions affecting their survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%