2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<997::aid-smj134>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
278
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
278
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…vii In a similar vein, Klepper and Simons (2000) describe how those firms in the television transmitter industry that had pre-existing competencies in the radio industry, were the ones that developed an early lead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…vii In a similar vein, Klepper and Simons (2000) describe how those firms in the television transmitter industry that had pre-existing competencies in the radio industry, were the ones that developed an early lead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hedonic prices and data on changes in quality are from the series used in Raff and Trajtenberg (1997 annual number of entry and exits, the average life-span of individual firms, the total number of firms, and total industry sales. Entry and exits are calculated using the same methodology in Klepper and Simons (2000). …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here a comparison between the conclusions of two recent industry studies is instructive. Klepper and Simons (2000) have shown that firms already established in making radios were subsequently the most successful in the newly developing colour TV market. On the other hand, Holbrook and his colleagues (2000) have shown that none of the firms established in designing and making thermionic valves were subsequently successful in establishing themselves in semiconductors.…”
Section: What's Changing: Creative Destruction In Organisational (Notmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, organizational reproduction and heredity are said to be the primary forces underlying the clustering of industry. 22 From the business history perspective, it has been argued that firms' strategy, internal economies, and organizational capabilities are what mostly lie behind the formation of competitive advantage in industries or territories. Alfred D. Chandler was perhaps the most prominent scholar to take this stance.…”
Section: Neo-marshallian Districts Versus Hub-firm Clusters In the Fomentioning
confidence: 99%