2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1613-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance, not kinship, determines individual position within the communal roosts of a cooperatively breeding bird

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they imply that indirect fitness benefits alone can select for limited dispersal, i.e., there is no need to invoke direct fitness benefits of philopatry as a pathway toward or facilitator of social interaction with kin and subsequent helping behavior (8,10,44). This conclusion is consistent with previous studies of long-tailed tits that suggest no benefit of social interaction with kin except in the context of helping (16,45). In noncooperative bird species, philopatry has often been reported to have direct fitness advantages for males (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…First, they imply that indirect fitness benefits alone can select for limited dispersal, i.e., there is no need to invoke direct fitness benefits of philopatry as a pathway toward or facilitator of social interaction with kin and subsequent helping behavior (8,10,44). This conclusion is consistent with previous studies of long-tailed tits that suggest no benefit of social interaction with kin except in the context of helping (16,45). In noncooperative bird species, philopatry has often been reported to have direct fitness advantages for males (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…While some studies find that individuals adjust behavior based on relatedness, e.g., (Wright et al 2010), other studies have found no relationship between relatedness and cooperative output (Canestrari et al 2005; Napper et al 2013) and, rarely, a negative relationship between relatedness and cooperative output (Zottl et al 2013). However, when the results from this study are paired with the finding that nest construction is also spatially directed towards relatives (van Dijk et al 2014), we find that the evidence strongly suggests indirect benefits are important for the evolutionary maintenance of cooperative nest construction in sociable weavers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In conclusion, we have revealed fine‐scale genetic structure in our long‐tailed tit population that is consistent with the kin clustering expected from known demographic and dispersal patterns. This provides an opportunity for kin selection to operate and, in the absence of any other known benefits of interacting socially with kin (Napper & Hatchwell, ; Napper, Sharp, McGowan, Simeoni, & Hatchwell, ), is likely to have emerged as a result of selection for kin‐directed helping behaviour. However, despite this genetic structure, the random probability of helping at the nest of a relative is still relatively low, demonstrating that in the kin‐selected cooperative breeding system of long‐tailed tits, active discrimination of kin from nonkin is required when choosing at which nest to help in order to maximize inclusive fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%