2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-019-00676-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance of weighted nested split graph networks in connections models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 It is straightforward to check that the model described in Sect. 3 satisfies all these conditions, under which the dominance of weighted DNSG-networks is established in Olaizola and Valenciano (2019). We omit the very easy detailed checking here to avoid a trivial digression.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7 It is straightforward to check that the model described in Sect. 3 satisfies all these conditions, under which the dominance of weighted DNSG-networks is established in Olaizola and Valenciano (2019). We omit the very easy detailed checking here to avoid a trivial digression.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2 shows an adjacency matrix that follows this pattern. 6 In order to make the paper basically self-contained, we briefly review the family of connections models considered in Olaizola and Valenciano (2019). As in the current model, a link-formation technology (as per Definition 2) rules the formation of costly weighted links among a set of nodes, each of them endowed with value v. The value that one node receives from another is what it receives through the strongest path connecting them, and what it receives through a path is a fraction of v proportional to the "strength" of their connection through that path.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations