2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance rank predicts social network position across developmental stages in rhesus monkeys

Abstract: Social network analysis is increasingly common in studying complex interactions among individuals. Across a range of primates, high-ranking adults are generally more socially connected, which results in better fitness outcomes. However, it still remains unclear whether this relationship between social network position and dominance rank emerges in infancy and whether, in species with a social transmission of dominance rank, social network positions are driven by the presence of the mother. To fill this gap, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(161 reference statements)
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In catarrhine monkeys with female philopatry such as vervet monkeys, females are more central than males in affiliative and proximity networks (e.g., Blaszczyk, 2018; Jarrett et al, 2018; Lehmann & Ross, 2011; Sosa, 2016). High‐ranked individuals are usually more aggressive and groomed more than others, which increases their centrality in affiliative and aggression networks (e.g., Blaszczyk, 2018; Borgeaud et al, 2017; macaques: Wooddell et al, 2019). Ontogeny may also affect individuals' network position (Borgeaud et al, 2016, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In catarrhine monkeys with female philopatry such as vervet monkeys, females are more central than males in affiliative and proximity networks (e.g., Blaszczyk, 2018; Jarrett et al, 2018; Lehmann & Ross, 2011; Sosa, 2016). High‐ranked individuals are usually more aggressive and groomed more than others, which increases their centrality in affiliative and aggression networks (e.g., Blaszczyk, 2018; Borgeaud et al, 2017; macaques: Wooddell et al, 2019). Ontogeny may also affect individuals' network position (Borgeaud et al, 2016, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by providing agonistic support in exchange for grooming 57,58 ). Remarkably, at the planation edge, this relationship was reversed, possibly because high-and low-ranking females may use different strategies to handle the potentially stressful environment and intense feeding competition posed by the plantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This numerical system tracks rank changes over time by constantly updating values according to wins and losses. We rely on Elo-ratings computed for adult female monkeys from >4,000 dominance interactions in 30-min observation sessions between 2013 and 2016, following previously established methods (Wooddell et al, 2016(Wooddell et al, , 2017aWooddell, Kaburu, and Dettmer, 2019).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%