2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2014.7025761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant edge direction based fast parameter estimation algorithm for sample adaptive offset in HEVC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…intra, inter, is required even in inter-prediction type slices. The other work has introduced a selection scheme based on a major edge direction of source samples with the same motivation [5].…”
Section: B Estimation With Fewer Sao Type Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…intra, inter, is required even in inter-prediction type slices. The other work has introduced a selection scheme based on a major edge direction of source samples with the same motivation [5].…”
Section: B Estimation With Fewer Sao Type Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the SAO encoding is known to incur relatively low computational demand compared to other coding tools, real-time or power-hungry video encoders still require more efficient SAO encoding algorithms in terms of computational complexity, power consumption or friendliness to the pipelining as well as the coding efficiency. To resolve these issues, some studies focused on improvement of the encoding from a practical point of view [4] [5], and others concerned about the filtering process including integration with the deblocking [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can corrupt effortlessly under system over-burden or on a moderate stage. J.Joo [13], in this we present the quick parameter estimation calculation for test versatile counterbalance in high effectiveness video coding. The primary thought of a proposed strategy is to rearrange choice of the best SAO edge balance class dependent on the overwhelming edge course data as opposed to looking through all EO classes comprehensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to find the best SAO parameters (SAO mode, type and offsets) by searching all possible combinations exhaustively, it is heavy computational burden to the encoder. For this reason, several works have been proposed to reduce the computational complexity in SAO parameter estimation [2][3][4]. J. Joo [2] proposed the fast SAO parameter estimation algorithm by exploiting the correlation between intra prediction mode and edge offset type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. E. Gendy [3] proposed the fast estimation method by reutilization of pre-determined SAO parameters in the previous frames. In [4], the best SAO edge offset is easily decided by using the Sobel edge operation in prior to SAO encoding process so that the computational complexity is successfully reduced with acceptable bitrate degradation. However, the complexity of the last algorithm [4] is still high due to the calculation of Sobel operation at every single pixel and the inaccurate edge derivation in the heavy noise image is another limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%