2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/139236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant Height Model for Site Classification ofEucalyptus grandisIncorporating Climatic Variables

Abstract: This study tested the effects of inserting climatic variables in Eucalyptus grandis as covariables of a dominant height model, which for site index classification is usually related to age alone. Dominant height values ranging from 1 to 12 years of age located in the Southeast region of Brazil were used, as well as data from 19 automatic meteorological stations from the area. The ChapmanRichards model was chosen to represent dominant height as a function of age. To include the environmental variables a modifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Scolforo et al (2013) used exploratory data analysis to select climatic variables and use it as input on Chapman and Richards model so that it increased its precision in 33%. Like the ANN, this kind of modified models can be potentially used to simulate site capacity with no planting history or in case of climatic changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Scolforo et al (2013) used exploratory data analysis to select climatic variables and use it as input on Chapman and Richards model so that it increased its precision in 33%. Like the ANN, this kind of modified models can be potentially used to simulate site capacity with no planting history or in case of climatic changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of using dominant height as a predictor variable is its response to climatic conditions and the possibility to explain this variation using regression models (e.g. Ferraz Filho et al, 2011;Scolforo et al, 2013). Other variables related to the plot's metrics, such as diameter, were explained using age (Mehtatälo, 2005), and could be considered interchangeable.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to scale effects [77], because our study sites were between 8 and 32 km from each other, climate and topographical attributes were not stronger determinants [19,[78][79][80][81][82] than soils for forest productivity. Additionally, the low number of study sites is a limitation of this work.…”
Section: Effects Of Climate and Topography On Forest Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%