1999
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.19.7.4582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant Negative Murine Serum Response Factor: Alternative Splicing within the Activation Domain Inhibits Transactivation of Serum Response Factor Binding Targets

Abstract: Primary transcripts encoding the MADS box superfamily of proteins, such as MEF2 in animals and ZEMa in plants, are alternatively spliced, producing several isoformic species. We show here that murine serum response factor (SRF) primary RNA transcripts are alternatively spliced at the fifth exon, deleting approximately one-third of the C-terminal activation domain. Among the different muscle types examined, visceral smooth muscles have a very low ratio of SRF⌬5 to SRF. Increased levels of SRF⌬5 correlates well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant to this review is that concentration gradients and alternatively spliced isoforms of SRF have specific effects on SMC gene transcription and consequently may contribute to SMC diversity. 22 In addition, myocardin has a heterogeneous expression pattern in SMCs of different tissues, 23 which may contribute to variations in marker gene expression and consequently SMC function. Whereas the transcription factors that regulate SMC phenotype are more and more defined, the list of factors that can activate or inhibit them continues to expand.…”
Section: Determinants Of Vascular Smc Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant to this review is that concentration gradients and alternatively spliced isoforms of SRF have specific effects on SMC gene transcription and consequently may contribute to SMC diversity. 22 In addition, myocardin has a heterogeneous expression pattern in SMCs of different tissues, 23 which may contribute to variations in marker gene expression and consequently SMC function. Whereas the transcription factors that regulate SMC phenotype are more and more defined, the list of factors that can activate or inhibit them continues to expand.…”
Section: Determinants Of Vascular Smc Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MADS box domain of SRF has been demonstrated to convey gene regulatory activity through associations with other factors, as well as being the DNA binding domain of the molecule (42,43,55,58). The SRF pm1 molecule contains three amino acid substitutions (Arg to Leu at position 143, Lys to Ala at position 145, and Leu to Gly at position 146) that interrupt DNA binding but do not alter the ability of the protein to dimerize (59). Cotransfection of the SRF pm1 mutant blocked SRF-mediated transcriptional activation of ␣-skeletal and ␣-cardiac actin promoters (43,46).…”
Section: Mnkx3-1 and Srf Coactivate ␥-Sm Actin Promotermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms have been shown to regulate the SRF transcription activity, including physical interaction of SRF with a number of positive and negative cofactors (6 -10), phosphorylation-dependent change in the DNA and/or protein binding ability of SRF (18), regulated nuclear translocation of SRF (19), and alternative splicing of SRF mRNA primary transcript (20,21). Recently, we have shown that an alternative spliced isoform of SRF is highly expressed in the failing hearts of both humans and animals, which act as a dominant negative isoform to repress SRF-dependent cardiac muscle gene expression (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%