2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant point detection by reverse polygonization of digital curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid ellipse detection methods use one or more of the above approaches as just an intermediate step in the ellipse detection algorithm. Other steps like sophisticated digital curve pre-processing techniques (Bhowmick and Bhattacharya, 2007;Carmona-Poyato et al, 2010;Masood, 2008;Prasad and Leung, 2010d;Prasad et al, 2011b;Prasad et al, 2012), curvature estimation and correction techniques (Anderson and Bezdek, 1984;Cazals and Pouget, 2005;Heikkila, 1998;Matas et al, 1995;Prasad et al, 2011a;Worring and Smeulders, 1993;Zhong et al, 2009), partial retrieval of ellipses' parameters using some geometric properties of ellipses (Guil and Zapata, 1997;Ho and Chen, 1995;Yuen et al, 1989;Zhang and Liu, 2005) are usually added before the actual ellipse detection method. Further, most hybrid methods include some or other form of grouping mechanism to group the edges that possibly belong to the same ellipse (Chia et al, 2011;Hahn et al, 2008;Kawaguchi and Nagata, 1998b;Kim et al, 2002;Mai et al, 2008).…”
Section: Contemporary Ellipse Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid ellipse detection methods use one or more of the above approaches as just an intermediate step in the ellipse detection algorithm. Other steps like sophisticated digital curve pre-processing techniques (Bhowmick and Bhattacharya, 2007;Carmona-Poyato et al, 2010;Masood, 2008;Prasad and Leung, 2010d;Prasad et al, 2011b;Prasad et al, 2012), curvature estimation and correction techniques (Anderson and Bezdek, 1984;Cazals and Pouget, 2005;Heikkila, 1998;Matas et al, 1995;Prasad et al, 2011a;Worring and Smeulders, 1993;Zhong et al, 2009), partial retrieval of ellipses' parameters using some geometric properties of ellipses (Guil and Zapata, 1997;Ho and Chen, 1995;Yuen et al, 1989;Zhang and Liu, 2005) are usually added before the actual ellipse detection method. Further, most hybrid methods include some or other form of grouping mechanism to group the edges that possibly belong to the same ellipse (Chia et al, 2011;Hahn et al, 2008;Kawaguchi and Nagata, 1998b;Kim et al, 2002;Mai et al, 2008).…”
Section: Contemporary Ellipse Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the compression ratio, ρ = m /m, is taken as a measure of approximation quality. This measure is also used in most of the related work (Bhowmick and Bhattacharya, 2007;Masood, 2008;Teh and Chin, 1989;Yin, 2004). As the control parameter τ increases, ρ decreases.…”
Section: Quality Of Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar [36] proposed the to make the tradeoff between the compression ratio (CR) and the total distortion (ISE) caused [22]. Rosin [32] showed that the two terms CR and ISE used by F OM are not balanced, causing the measure to be biased towards approximations with lower ISE (which can be easily attained by increasing the number of detected dominant points).…”
Section: Performance Quality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rosin's evaluation can compare results of different algorithms with different number of dominant points. Nevertheless, Masood [22] pointed out that this method also suffers a few weaknesses. The polygon that consists of just break points will produce Fidelity = 100, Efficiency = 100 and Merit = 100.…”
Section: Eopt Eapprmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation