2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0022381609090732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domination and Distributive Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13. It is worth noticing that Lovett (2009Lovett ( , 2010 seems to endorse (although implicitly) a similar position in his formulation of the conception of justice, which he calls 'justice as minimizing domination ' (2010, p. 159). He seems to suggest that a republican society, in order to guarantee the absence (or minimization) of domination, needs to produce policies that satisfy certain principles of distributive justice (2010, p. 156).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. It is worth noticing that Lovett (2009Lovett ( , 2010 seems to endorse (although implicitly) a similar position in his formulation of the conception of justice, which he calls 'justice as minimizing domination ' (2010, p. 159). He seems to suggest that a republican society, in order to guarantee the absence (or minimization) of domination, needs to produce policies that satisfy certain principles of distributive justice (2010, p. 156).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is 'just' in a global order and how to achieve it has been a contested topic (Rawls 1971;Walzer 1983;Barry 1989;Young 1990;Moellendorf 2002;Singer 2002;Buchanan 2004;Caney 2005;Nagel 2005;Fraser 2007;Lovett 2009;Sen 2009;Forst 2012Forst , 2015Dryzek 2013Dryzek , 2015Kolers 2014). Indeed, the very act of defining what is just, assumes a right and capacity to do so, and potentially sets up a position of domination vis á vis other actors and interests with the danger of itself creating another injustice.…”
Section: Globus and The Three Understandings Of Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith feared that the division of labor and corresponding technological innovation that drives the great productivity of modern exchange economies also adversely affects a worker's spirit and his capacity for moral judgment (Smith, 1776b, p. 368). 22 For more on republicanism and free markets, see (Lovett, 2009;Pettit, 2013). 23 "Basic needs," in other words, must be understood so as to include not only what is necessary for bare survival, but also meet what are sometimes referred to as the needs or interests fundamental for social agency.…”
Section: Democratic Freedom and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%