2024
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2023.3338469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOMR: Toward Deep Open-World Malware Recognition

Tingting Lu,
Junfeng Wang
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the realm of Android malware, Zhang et al [12] utilized a deep forest and feature enhancement approach for detection, highlighting the effectiveness of ensemble learning methods in this context [12]. Lu and Wang's exploration of deep openworld malware recognition [13] and Kim et al's automated zero-day malware detection system [14] both contribute to the ongoing effort to detect previously unknown malware types, a critical aspect of cyber security sets.…”
Section: Ravi Et Al's Attention-based Multidimensional Deep Learning ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of Android malware, Zhang et al [12] utilized a deep forest and feature enhancement approach for detection, highlighting the effectiveness of ensemble learning methods in this context [12]. Lu and Wang's exploration of deep openworld malware recognition [13] and Kim et al's automated zero-day malware detection system [14] both contribute to the ongoing effort to detect previously unknown malware types, a critical aspect of cyber security sets.…”
Section: Ravi Et Al's Attention-based Multidimensional Deep Learning ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, signature matching dominated the industry's approach to malware identification [1], [2], [3], boasting high accuracy for known malware but falling short against unknown threats. Subsequently, heuristic-based methods emerged, defining static or dynamic rules to identify malware based on its characteristics [4], [5], [6]. While capable of detecting some unknown malicious codes, these methods suffer from a high false alarm rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%