Don’t Forget the Caregivers! A Discrete Choice Experiment Examining Caregiver Views of Integrated Youth Services

Abstract

Background The design and implementation of community-based integrated youth service hubs (IYSHs) is burgeoning around the world. This collaborative model of care aims to address barriers in youth service access by designing services that meet the needs of youth and caregivers. However, heterogeneity across models requires a better understanding of the preferences for key service characteristics. Method A discrete choice experiment was conducted among 274 caregivers of youth aged 14–29 years with mental health challenges. The experiment consisted of 12 attributes with four levels each, representing different service components; additional measures were collected, including demographics and burden assessments. Utility values were calculated, representing the degree of preference for a given level of an attribute. Latent class analysis was conducted to understand subgroups with different service preferences, identifying three latent classes with differing IYSH service preferences. Results The largest class ( n = 173, 63.1%), entitled ‘Comprehensive, Integrative Service Access’, strongly valued practical aspects of service design, such as rapid access and support for a wide range of needs. The ‘Service Process Features’ class ( n = 67, 24.5%) expressed a relative prioritization of process features of service access, while the smaller ‘Caregiver Involvement’ ( n = 34, 12.4%) class most highly prioritized caregiver involvement in their youths’ services. Similar demographic characteristics and caregiver burden were found across classes, although participants in the Caregiver Involvement latent class were supporting younger youth. Discussion and Conclusions Caregivers have diverse youth service preferences and relative priorities that should be taken into account when designing services. System designers and service providers are encouraged to take caregivers’ preferences and priorities into account, alongside youth priorities, whether designing service delivery models or an individual service plan for a youth. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00510-6.

Navigating inequities in the delivery of youth mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives of youth, families, and service providers

“…There has been ample evidence showing the important role of families in mental health and addiction recovery and the positive impact on mental health outcomes (Lucksted et al, 2012;MHCC, 2015), but they continue to be excluded from youth mental health services (Miller et al, 2017). Hawke et al (2021b) examined service preferences for caregivers of youth and young adults aged 14-29 and found that caregiver involvement in treatment was identified as a strong priority. The increased mental health needs of youth and burden on caregivers have led to the development of navigation services which offer support to caregivers and ensure youth and families are matched with appropriate mental health and addiction services to meet their needs (Markoulakis et al, 2019(Markoulakis et al, , 2020.…”

Youth Perspectives on Integrated Youth Services: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment

“…Participants & procedure. The project included samples of youth, caregivers, and service providers 37,38 ; this paper presents youth findings. Flyers with survey links were distributed to organizations on an internal database of Ontario youth-serving organizations 39 , with a request to circulate the flyer in their networks.…”

Becoming our young people’s case managers: caregivers’ experiences, needs, and ideas for improving opioid use treatments for young people using opioids

“…These hubs aim to provide young people (typically ages 12-24) with rapid access to comprehensive support, including mental health, substance use, primary care, social, and peer support services in integrated, community-based, and youth-friendly settings [ 48 , 49 ]. Emerging evidence suggests that IYS hubs are highly endorsed by youth [ 50 ], caregivers [ 51 ] and service providers [ 52 ], with further research on their effectiveness in the assessment and treatment of harmful substance use highly anticipated [ 49 ].…”