2014
DOI: 10.1080/14681811.2014.918539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don't forget, Thursday is test[icle] time! The use of humour in sexuality education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a mechanism for public engagement with social issues, contemporary comedy works in several ways. Comedy has been shown to attract public attention to serious topics (Xenos and Becker, 2009), to remain memorable (Blanc and Brigaud, 2014; Nabi et al, 2007), to encourage engagement with taboo topics (Allen, 2014), to encourage sharing (Fraustino and Ma, 2015), to encourage public engagement (Feldman et al, 2011), and to work symbiotically with serious news (Baum, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a mechanism for public engagement with social issues, contemporary comedy works in several ways. Comedy has been shown to attract public attention to serious topics (Xenos and Becker, 2009), to remain memorable (Blanc and Brigaud, 2014; Nabi et al, 2007), to encourage engagement with taboo topics (Allen, 2014), to encourage sharing (Fraustino and Ma, 2015), to encourage public engagement (Feldman et al, 2011), and to work symbiotically with serious news (Baum, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negativity that lies within comedic mockery might be considered problematic. Previous studies have shown that political humor increases cynicism toward mainstream news and the democratic process; however, it simultaneously gives audiences confidence in navigating the political public debate (Baumgartner and Morris, 2006) and can encourage engagement with taboo topics (Allen, 2014).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that humour and shared laughter were common among participants throughout the wānanga, perhaps serving as a tool to overcome embarrassment or awkwardness and to foster a relaxed environment. 33 Overall, participants were engaged and expressed curiosity about the topic as evidenced by a steady flow of conversation and ideas. Knowledge-sharing went both ways; facilitators shared information about STI testing during the wānanga and a summary of research findings was disseminated to organisations and participants once data had been collated.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%