2021
DOI: 10.1037/mot0000218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don’t make a habit out of it: Impaired learning conditions can make goal-directed behavior seem habitual.

Abstract: Habitual processes are often seen as the mechanisms underlying various suboptimal behaviors. Moors et al. (2017) challenged this view, arguing that the influence of goal-directed processes may be underestimated in explaining suboptimal behavior. Much evidence for habitual processes in humans comes from studies that used an outcome devaluation test within a task called the Fabulous Fruit Game (FFG; de Wit et al., 2007). In particular, poor performance on the FFG has been taken as evidence for increased reliance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with other recent theoretical and empirical work (Buabang et al, 2021a(Buabang et al, , 2021bDe Houwer et al, 2018;Hogarth, 2020Hogarth, , 2022Hommel & Wiers, 2017;…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in line with other recent theoretical and empirical work (Buabang et al, 2021a(Buabang et al, , 2021bDe Houwer et al, 2018;Hogarth, 2020Hogarth, , 2022Hommel & Wiers, 2017;…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the popularity of stimulus-driven explanations for suboptimal behavior such as action slips, recent theoretical and empirical work has challenged the explanatory power of stimulus-driven processes (Buabang et al, 2021;De Houwer et al, 2018;Hogarth, 2020;Hommel & Wiers, 2017;Kruglanski & Szumowska, 2020;Moors et al, 2017). Moors et al (2017) proposed an alternative dual process model with a parallel-competitive architecture in which stimulus-driven and goal-directed processes can both be automatic.…”
Section: A Goal-directed Account Of Action Slips: the Reliance On Old Contingenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 However, this definition identifies habits on the failure to satisfy criteria for goal-directed action (negative definition), including the possibility that unforeseen factors compromise integration of changes in action-outcome conditioning. 45 , 46 Besides, traditionally used habit measures can only be applied once in a given individual and are not suited to detect individual differences, both of which are critical features, since habits develop slowly and recruitment of habitual strategies vary significantly between individuals. To address these limitations, we set out to develop a paradigm that “positively” identifies habits, accounts for individual differences, and may be repeated within a subject to track gradual habit development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%