1996
DOI: 10.1080/014492996120157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projectsthere are many!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are situations where the selected approach has been found to be counterproductive or has been characterised as demanding (McKeen & Guimaraes, 1997). For example, Wilson, Bekker, Johnson, and Johnson (1996) and Heinbokel, Sonnentag, Frese, Stolte, and Brodbeck (1996) reported that user participation may have negative effects on project performance. Problems can arise when systems developers have to resolve conflicts between user groups or when users demand late changes.…”
Section: Benefits and Drawbacks Of User Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are situations where the selected approach has been found to be counterproductive or has been characterised as demanding (McKeen & Guimaraes, 1997). For example, Wilson, Bekker, Johnson, and Johnson (1996) and Heinbokel, Sonnentag, Frese, Stolte, and Brodbeck (1996) reported that user participation may have negative effects on project performance. Problems can arise when systems developers have to resolve conflicts between user groups or when users demand late changes.…”
Section: Benefits and Drawbacks Of User Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches such as contextual design (Beyer and Holtzblatt, 1998), participatory design (Muller and Kuhn, 1993) and scenario based design (Rosson and Carroll, 2002) have been developed to incorporate user perspectives within the design of new systems. However, such approaches demand a complete commitment to user-centred design: a commitment which not all development teams are willing or able to make (Heinbokel et al, 1996). The work reported here recognises this and instead addressed the question: can we tailor usability evaluation techniques to be incorporated effectively and useably within system-oriented design practice?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also no consensus on the results or effect of user participation in ISD projects. Researchers find different results (Brodbeck, 2001;He & King, 2008;Heinbokel, Sonnentag, Frese, Stolte, & Brodbeck, 1996;Ives & Olson, 1984;McKeen, Guimaraes, & Wetherbe, 1994), and, although most are positive, there is still a lack of consistent empirical data to support these claims (Gallivan & Keil, 2003). Hence, effect of user participation on project success is underresearched and there is an incomplete understanding of the kind of user participation and the impact of such user participation on the success of an ISD project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%