2013
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor anxiety, needle pain, and syncopal reactions combine to determine retention: a path analysis of two‐year donor return data

Abstract: BACKGROUND Efforts to expand the donor pool by recruiting younger donors have resulted in higher numbers of initial donations, but retention of young donors continues to be a problem. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Path analysis was used to examine the simultaneous relationships among syncopal reactions, donation anxiety, needle pain, donor satisfaction, and donation intention in the prediction of repeat donation. Participants included 421 first- and second-time donors recruited for a study comparing the effects o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
63
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the individual may find the symptoms distressing, thus promoting avoidance of future medical or otherwise important procedures [11,12,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the individual may find the symptoms distressing, thus promoting avoidance of future medical or otherwise important procedures [11,12,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third study using the same 1,715 donors followed blood donor return rates over a 2-year period [66]. Fear decreased the blood donor return rate from 55% (no fear) to 45% (fear), but fear also affected the vasovagal reaction rate, and vasovagal reactions decreased the blood donor return rate from 56 to 36%.…”
Section: Reducing Vasovagal Reactions and Increasing Donor Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized study of 421 donors [66] did not show a 2-year return rate difference between college donors given water and muscle tension (9.9% vasovagal reaction rate) versus no interventions (17.9% vasovagal reaction rate). The return rates were 35% or 34%.…”
Section: Reducing Vasovagal Reactions and Increasing Donor Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas such stimuli undoubtedly deter a portion of the population from ever attempting to donate blood, for others both internal and external motivational forces encourage them to face their fear(s). While this decision is laudable, among blood donors higher anxiety has been related to greater needle pain, decreased donation satisfaction, increased risk for vasovagal reactions, and a decreased likelihood of repeat donation . Indeed, donors who report any level of fear in response to the question “How afraid are you of having blood drawn from your arm?” are more likely to experience a faint or prefaint reaction and are less likely to provide a future donation .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%