Donor approaches to food security in the Pacific: Sustainable development goal 2 and the need for more inclusive agricultural development

Abstract

As part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, sustainable development goal 2 (SDG2) specifically seeks to ‘End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture’. However, there is no clear prescription for how this goal should be achieved which allows various donors adopting diverse strategies to all claim they are contributing to SDG2. This article examines whether policies of five donors on food security and agriculture in the Pacific Islands region are likely to help to achieve SDG2. Fundamentally, the current and future wellbeing of many Pacific Island peoples, many of whom live on small, geographically dispersed islands with limited market access, is strongly tied to their abilities to produce food for themselves. This is somewhat overlooked by bilateral donors from Australia and New Zealand who invest relatively small amounts in the agriculture sector of Pacific countries and show little interest in supporting people's food security through local sourcing and production for subsistence. From an SDG2 perspective of ending hunger for all people, it is positive to see that, by contrast, two multilaterals have shown commitment to a more balanced and holistic approach to food production in the Pacific Islands region.

Using animal productivity in programming regional agricultural development

“…In 2022, cattle imports decreased by 11.4% compared to 2020, and by 36.8% compared to 2021. This is due to the introduction of numerous sanctions in 2022 against the Russian Federation, as well as the high cost of imported breeding animals, since their cost is tied to the euro exchange rate [32].…”

State support for agriculture based on the development of commodity lending in animal husbandry

“…Since this is the minimum period with perfectly coordinated actions of all project participants: the customer, designer, builders, suppliers of animals and equipment, fodder, etc. [30][31][32][33][34] And, most importantly, with full timely funding.…”

Production of sugar beet in Russian Federation: analysis and forecast

“…In addition, the analysis of Fig. 1 makes it possible to assume a multiplicative relationship between the main trend and the cyclical component in the dynamics of time series [28][29][30][31][32].…”