Background and ObjectivesNotifying blood donors of their reactive status for transfusion‐transmitted infections (TTIs) plays a vital role in enabling early diagnosis and management while also preventing these donors from making future donation and transmission of the infectious agent. Given the limited data on donor notification processes in India, a narrative review was conducted to assess the existing notification process and identify areas requiring enhancement.Materials and MethodsWe conducted literature searches using PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus, employing various keywords. The review included data on the year of the study, study design, donor numbers, TTI screening methods, sero‐reactive donor confirmation, notification frequency and methods, donor responses, post‐test counselling and risk factor assessment.ResultsOut of the 29 identified articles, 16 studies were included in the analysis. Repeat testing for initially reactive results was conducted in nine studies for 24.3% reactive donors. Phone calls were the primary notification method in most studies (8; 50%), with letters sent in cases of no response. Only 12 studies provided data on notified donors, revealing a notification rate of 71.2%. Of all initially reactive donors, 33.3% sought post‐test counselling. Data from six studies indicated that 74.3% of responsive donors had identifiable TTI risk factors.ConclusionOur review revealed significant variability in the notification processes across different studies. To enhance the management of TTI‐reactive donor notifications and responses, we recommend the establishment of universal protocols encompassing pre‐donation counselling, repeat/confirmatory testing, notification methods and comprehensive follow‐up and treatment.