2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor polymer design enables efficient non-fullerene organic solar cells

Abstract: To achieve efficient organic solar cells, the design of suitable donor–acceptor couples is crucially important. State-of-the-art donor polymers used in fullerene cells may not perform well when they are combined with non-fullerene acceptors, thus new donor polymers need to be developed. Here we report non-fullerene organic solar cells with efficiencies up to 10.9%, enabled by a novel donor polymer that exhibits strong temperature-dependent aggregation but with intentionally reduced polymer crystallinity due to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
271
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
271
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ternary OSCs were fabricated in a configuration of tin-doped indium oxide (ITO)/ZnO/PTFB-O:SMA1:SMA2/ V 2 O 5 /Al (Figure 1c), where SMA1 and SMA2 are the two small molecular acceptors. [67] The weight ratio is kept at 1:1.5 (polymer:total acceptor) for all ternary blends with only the SMAs' relative weight ratio being tuned. [67] The weight ratio is kept at 1:1.5 (polymer:total acceptor) for all ternary blends with only the SMAs' relative weight ratio being tuned.…”
Section: Ternary Blend Design and Photovoltaic Device Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ternary OSCs were fabricated in a configuration of tin-doped indium oxide (ITO)/ZnO/PTFB-O:SMA1:SMA2/ V 2 O 5 /Al (Figure 1c), where SMA1 and SMA2 are the two small molecular acceptors. [67] The weight ratio is kept at 1:1.5 (polymer:total acceptor) for all ternary blends with only the SMAs' relative weight ratio being tuned. [67] The weight ratio is kept at 1:1.5 (polymer:total acceptor) for all ternary blends with only the SMAs' relative weight ratio being tuned.…”
Section: Ternary Blend Design and Photovoltaic Device Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Taking PTFB-O and PTFB-P with nearly identical chemical structures, energy levels, and absorption spectrum, for example, PTFB-P is significantly more crystallinity than PTFB-O due to the C2 symmetry of the difluorinated monomer unit. Previous studies indicate that polymers with slightly reduced crystallinity maybe a better match for nonfullerene acceptor.…”
Section: Charge Mobilities Domain Purity and Domain Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimized PCE of 9.6% with high FF of 0.671 was attained with wide bandgap polymer PDBT‐T1. Moreover, with medium bandgap polymer PTFB‐O, improved PCE of 10.88% with J SC of 17.6 mA cm −2 and FF of 0.69 was reported for ITIC‐Th ‐based OSC due to smaller pure domain reducing charge recombination …”
Section: Nfas and Various Aspects Of Freasmentioning
confidence: 98%