2005
DOI: 10.1002/micr.20169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor-site necrosis following fibula free-flap transplantation: A report of three cases

Abstract: The free fibula flap is the microsurgeon's workhorse for the reconstruction of osseous or osteocutaneous defects. Donor-site morbidity of this flap is reported to occur infrequently, and is generally considered minor and transient. We present the case histories of three patients with necrosis at the fibula flap donor site to stress the risks and explain the possible mechanisms of such severe complications. The small risk of debilitating donor-site necrosis should be considered and discussed preoperatively with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, multiple osteotomies of the fibula to confirm to the maxilla and mandible are feasible without devascularising individual segments. Moreover FFF offers tremendous bicortical bone stock for dental implant placement and a versatile cutaneous unit for concomitant soft tissue reconstruction [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Also FFF based on separate septocutaneous perforators is of benefit to extensive substitution to externally cutaneous and internally oral linings [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, multiple osteotomies of the fibula to confirm to the maxilla and mandible are feasible without devascularising individual segments. Moreover FFF offers tremendous bicortical bone stock for dental implant placement and a versatile cutaneous unit for concomitant soft tissue reconstruction [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Also FFF based on separate septocutaneous perforators is of benefit to extensive substitution to externally cutaneous and internally oral linings [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include impaired wound healing, cellulitis, transient sensory loss in the peroneal nerve territory, cold intolerance, calf muscle weakness, pain or cramp, impingement on peroneal muscles, edema of the leg after prolonged standing, esthetically unsatisfactory scar, valgus deformity, instability or stiffness of the ankle, gait disturbance, restriction of the big toe in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, compartment syndrome, and limb loss. 2,3 The DCIA free flap has not been without complications, which include gait disturbance, hernia, femoral nerve weakness, pain, tightness, hypertrophic scar, seroma, wound infection, and inclusion cyst. 4 The fibula and DCIA free flap donor sites have been directly compared in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, most of the complications in other series are minor complications such as great toe contractures that do not require any intervention. 4,12 Postoperative foot ischemia and necrosis is undoubtedly the greatest and most severe complication. It is relatively uncommon, and there is no clear information on its incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Loss of skin graft applied to the donor site, cellulitis, wound healing problems, and abscesses are among the short-term complications; whereas weakness in the foot, ankle instability, great toe contracture, or sensory disorders may be seen in the long term. 3,4 The most dreaded major donorsite complication is ischemia of the foot, which is fortunately rare. 5 This condition may result from sacrifice of the peroneal artery in the presence of an underlying traumatic, atherosclerotic, or congenital vascular disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%