Donors Perceptions of Consent to and Feedback from Biobank Research: Time to Acknowledge Diversity?

Abstract

Background: Many studies have explored public perspectives on when and how to provide informed consent to biobank research and when to get feedback on research results. Little has been done to explore overarching trends in these studies. Methods: The article is based on a critical reading of the literature found through Medline searches and the PRIVILEGED project compilation of empirical studies. Results: I suggest that tissue type, procurement situation including who is asked to provide consent, and the biobank’s geographical, social and historical context influence how various potential donors view the issues of consent, re-consent, and feedback of research results. In light of this, universal ethical standards for informed consent to and feedback of research results from biobank research seem to run contrary to the diversity of perceptions and expectations among different donors. Conclusion: To respect donor interests, it is necessary to pay more attention to diversity with regard to biobank types and different contexts for donation. We should avoid assuming that words like ‘biobank’ and ‘donor’ can be used in a generic sense – always referring to the same – if we wish to respect and care for the diverse group of individuals who comprise the donating public.

Increasing the acceptability and rates of organ donation among minority ethnic groups: a programme of observational and evaluative research on Donation, Transplantation and Ethnicity (DonaTE)

“…104 For example, it is crucial to recognise the heterogeneity of social groups, the interplay between individual values and collective values held by particular groups, and differences in attitudes according to types of tissue being considered for donation. 105 It is particularly important to engage both health-care professionals and community members with these issues, which will become all the more stark as medical expertise develops and renders cross-community donation unproblematic. 3.…”

The Return of Unexpected Research Results in a Biobank Study and Referral to Health Care for Heritable Long QT Syndrome

“…More recently, an expert group in the US [2] concluded from various guidelines that participants' incidental findings which are analytically valid, reveal a substantial risk for a serious health condition and are clinically actionable should be offered to consenting contributors. However, Hoeyer [3] argues that there is a large variation in the type and the purpose of a biobank as well as in traditions and cultural factors in different populations that could be against universal feedback policy. Currently, there are biobanks such as the Personal Genome Project that will give all genetic information back to participants, but many biobanks like DeCode genetics have not returned genetic information to participants [4].…”

Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan

“…In fact, evaluating public support for research and biobanking and preference with regards to consent, as well as understanding cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds that can influence such perceptions, are important in preparing for the establishment of biobanking facilities. 2 Such information would help in designing a realistic set of laws that can promote and organize biomedical research while protecting individuals.…”