1994
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91517-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine agonists and stress produce different patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the lateral habenula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
71
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
18
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, prolonged induction of c-Fos has been reported in unusual conditions [21,22]. Previous studies [1] observed that chronic stimulants of different types, e.g., exposure of rats to longer periods of immobilization and continuous administration of dopamine agonists or cocaine resulted in the labeling of greater numbers of c-Fos protein-like immunoreactive neurons in the lateral habenular nucleus. Furthermore, several lines of evidence suggest that the lateral habenular nucleus is the site of functional interactions between the different parts of the central nervous system [5][6][7]23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, prolonged induction of c-Fos has been reported in unusual conditions [21,22]. Previous studies [1] observed that chronic stimulants of different types, e.g., exposure of rats to longer periods of immobilization and continuous administration of dopamine agonists or cocaine resulted in the labeling of greater numbers of c-Fos protein-like immunoreactive neurons in the lateral habenular nucleus. Furthermore, several lines of evidence suggest that the lateral habenular nucleus is the site of functional interactions between the different parts of the central nervous system [5][6][7]23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, it is strongly believed that the lateral habenular nucleus is involved in a variety of important biological functions and behaviors, e.g., stress processing [1], sleep disorder [2], pain [3] and reproductive behaviors [4]. These diverse biological functions of the lateral habenular nucleus were suggested to be due to its connections with the dopaminergic, serotoninergic and cholinergic systems [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons in a round, circumscribed area in the LHbM are activated by different forms of stress, like immobilization, placement in a novel environment, food deprivation, chronic intermittent hypoxia, and lithium injection (Chastrette et al, 1991;Wirtshafter et al, 1994;Sica et al, 2000;Timonefa and Richard, 2001). This round, circumscribed area closely resembles the appearance of the LHbMPc/LHbMC in shape, size, and position, suggesting a role of this subnucleus in mediating a stress response.…”
Section: Putative Functional Roles Of Individual Subnucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is implicated in a variety of biological functions. Its involvement in stress responses (Chastrette et al, 1991;Wirtshafter et al, 1994;Sica et al, 2000;Amat et al, 2001), in maternal behavior (Corodimas et al, 1993;Wagner et al, 1998;Kalinichev et al, 2000), in male social behavior (De Vries et al, 1984;Insel et al, 1994), and in reward behavior (Brown et al, 1992;Hunt and McGregor, 1998) is well documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Together, these results suggest that the habenula may play a more active and central role in the long-term modification of monoamine transmission and behavioral responses subsequent to aversive and stressful events. Electrophysiological and c-fos immunoreactivity studies in rodents have indeed demonstrated that the habenula is activated in response to various aversive stressors, including stimulation of the tail, restraint, novel environments, and footshock (Benabid and Jeaugey, 1989;Wirtshafter et al, 1994;Gao et al, 1996;Smith et al, 1997). We have previously reported that the habenula also showed increased expression of synaptic plasticity genes associated with long-term changes in neuronal activity in response to stress associated with fear conditioning (Ressler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%