2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412314111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine challenge reveals neuroadaptive changes in marijuana abusers

Bertha K. Madras
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPH could have modulated these receptors differently in HC and CUD accounting for the decreases in negative connectivity in CUD and the enhanced negative connectivity in HC. Interestingly, MPH normalized connectivity for CUD, reducing the negative connectivity to the levels in HC under placebo status, which we interpret to suggest that MPH might have alleviated the dopaminergic deficits in CUD [49][50][51]. This finding reiterates the pivotal role of NAc and the thalamus in stimulant drugs effects and in addiction [52].…”
Section: Concomitant Metabolic Changes (Mph-pl) In the Thalamic Seedssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…MPH could have modulated these receptors differently in HC and CUD accounting for the decreases in negative connectivity in CUD and the enhanced negative connectivity in HC. Interestingly, MPH normalized connectivity for CUD, reducing the negative connectivity to the levels in HC under placebo status, which we interpret to suggest that MPH might have alleviated the dopaminergic deficits in CUD [49][50][51]. This finding reiterates the pivotal role of NAc and the thalamus in stimulant drugs effects and in addiction [52].…”
Section: Concomitant Metabolic Changes (Mph-pl) In the Thalamic Seedssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Some further matching to fentanyl (S 13,17 = 0.91) and the other two members of this family (S 13,18 = 0.82, S 13,19 = 0.81) has not been examined yet. It is worth noting that (THC) shows a high matching to both cocaine (S 13,1 = 0.85) and MDMA (S 13,5 = 0.85) that has been well depicted in a recent study on the dopamine release and the reward effect caused by cannabis [60,61].…”
Section: Euclidean Distances/similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…While the dopaminergic response to an amphetamine challenge in abstinent mild cannabis dependents was shown to be analogous to that seen in matched controls in one study [83], another investigation found significantly blunted ventral striatal methylphenidate-induced dopaminergic activity (reduced decreases in distribution volumes of [ 11 C]-raclopride) in dependent cannabis users compared to controls [84]. Taken collectively, these studies suggest that a history of chronic cannabis use may produce alterations in the brain dopamine system, an effect that may not necessarily be driven by abnormalities in D2/3 receptor levels [87]. Nonetheless, at this time, it would appear that the severity of damage caused by long-term cannabis use may be of decreased magnitude relative to other drugs of abuse [88].…”
Section: The Dopaminergic System In Cannabis Use and Dependencementioning
confidence: 94%