2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01721.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine inhibition of auditory nerve activity in the adult mammalian cochlea

Abstract: Efferent feedback systems provide a means for modulating the input to the central nervous system. The lateral olivocochlear efferents modulate auditory nerve activity via synapses with afferent dendrites below sensory inner hair cells. We examined the effects of dopamine, one of the lateral olivocochlear neurotransmitters, by recording compound and single unit activity from the auditory nerve in adult guinea pigs. Intracochlear application of dopamine reduced the compound action potential (CAP) of the auditory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
164
3
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
164
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that DA might ''turn down'' driven activity in the normal auditory system. During infusion of DA agonists, auditory nerve single-unit driven rates (Oestreicher et al 1997;Ruel et al 2001), the whole-nerve response (d'Aldin et al 1995a, b;Ruel et al 2001), and spontaneous firing rates [according to Ruel et al (2001) DA appears to reduce auditory nerve activity, but each of the past de-efferentation investigations (e.g., Liberman 1990;Zheng et al 1999), as well as the current LSO lesion experiment, supports a net excitatory effect of lateral efferent innervation of the cochlea. That is, auditory nerve activity has been depressed in the absence of lateral efferent innervation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that DA might ''turn down'' driven activity in the normal auditory system. During infusion of DA agonists, auditory nerve single-unit driven rates (Oestreicher et al 1997;Ruel et al 2001), the whole-nerve response (d'Aldin et al 1995a, b;Ruel et al 2001), and spontaneous firing rates [according to Ruel et al (2001) DA appears to reduce auditory nerve activity, but each of the past de-efferentation investigations (e.g., Liberman 1990;Zheng et al 1999), as well as the current LSO lesion experiment, supports a net excitatory effect of lateral efferent innervation of the cochlea. That is, auditory nerve activity has been depressed in the absence of lateral efferent innervation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more speculative, we acknowledge there is at least one mechanism through which disruption of DA release by the lateral efferent neurons in the cochlea could result in a depression of CAP amplitude, as shown in the current findings. When DA receptors in the cochlea are blocked with the D1 receptor antagonist eticlopride or the D2 receptor antagonist SCH-23390, high-spontaneous-rate auditory nerve fibers show a transient increase in spontaneous rate followed by a depression in rate (Ruel et al 2001). At least the eticlopride-induced depression in rate is accompanied by auditory nerve dendritic swelling (Ruel et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dopamine and DA agonists inhibit AN activity (d'Aldin et al 1995a, b;Oestreicher et al 1997;Ruel et al 2001;Sun and Salvi 2001). Both GABA (Felix and Ehrenberger 1992;Malgrange et al 1997;Arnold et al 1998) and enkephalin (Burki et al 1993) similarly inhibit AN activity.…”
Section: Pharmacology Of Loc Disruption: Excitatory and Inhibitory Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damages that result in reduced sensitivity or gain after noise trauma are more difficult to locate because very peripheral mechanisms, such as those producing conductive hearing loss, as well as presumably central processes such as attention or expectations (Dai and Wright 1995), can affect the sensitivity, possibly also via efferent feedback (e.g., Puel et al 1988;Ruel et al 2001). Nevertheless, damage within the inner ear is most likely to contribute.…”
Section: Location Of Damages Captured By Altered Baseline and Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%