“…A third, but less acknowledged, hypothesis is that the different subdivisions of the anterior DVR as a field are homologous to both cortical and claustrum/amygdala cell types Molnar and Butler, 2002). To address these hypotheses, a number of elegant comparative and manipulation experiments have since been performed, but still with continued conflicting conclusions Medina and Abellan, 2009;Nomura et al, 2009;Uchida et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010; Aboitiz, 2011;Butler et al, 2011;Kuenzel et al, 2011;Medina et al, 2011;Puelles, 2011;Tanaka et al, 2011;Atoji and Karim 2012;Dugas-Ford et al, 2012;Suzuki et al, 2012).Resolving these hypotheses, we believe, is in part hampered by yet another set of unanswered questions on our still limited understanding of overall avian brain organization.To address this issue, here we quantitatively analyzed telencephalic expression profiles of 46 constitutive and 6 activity-responsive genes (52 total; (Kubikova et al, 2010), the SEMA6A axon guidance receptor , cannabinoid receptor (Soderstrom et al, 2004), and retinoic acid orphan related receptor beta (ROR-β; this study); the NRN, BDNF, and SCUBE1 protein ligands (Wada et al, 2006;Lovell et al, 2008); the DLX6 (this study), FOXP1, FOXP2, ER81, COUP-TF2, LHX8, LHX9, NKX2.1, PAX6, EGR1, C-FOS, and C-JUN transcriptions factors (Jarvis and Nottebohm, 1997;Kimpo and Doupe, 1997;Haesler et al, 2004;Jarvis et al, 2005;Abellan et al, 2009); the FKBP1A (this study), DUSP1 (a.k.a. map kinase phosphatase 1 [mkp1]), and PPAPDC1A enzymes Horita et al, 2010Horita et al, , 2012; and a diverse set of membrane and cytoplasmic genes, including ARPP16 (this study), TMEM100 (this study), ARC, CADPS2, and S100B (Wada et al, 2006;Lovell et al, 2008) (Table 1).…”