2015
DOI: 10.1124/pr.115.010512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine’s Actions in Primate Prefrontal Cortex: Challenges for Treating Cognitive Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
128
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(175 reference statements)
9
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that disruption of the excitation/inhibition balance in the PFC has been associated with many aforementioned psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (Krause et al, 2013; Lisman, 2012; Winterer and Weinberger, 2004; Yizhar et al, 2011) and ADHD (Moll et al, 2003; Pouget et al, 2009; Won et al, 2011), the individual actions as well as cooperative effects of both transmitters on synaptic transmission, intracellular signaling, and neuronal integration within immature and mature PFC circuitry are thus critical for the execution of prefrontal functions. How NE and DA, individually or synergistically, activate their respective receptors and the effects this on prefrontal functioning at the cellular, physiological, and behavioral level has been well-studied and reviewed in the past (Arnsten, 2011; Arnsten and Pliszka, 2011; Arnsten et al, 2015a; Arnsten et al, 2012b; Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003; Berridge and Arnsten, 2013; Brennan and Arnsten, 2008; Clark and Noudoost, 2014; Puig et al, 2014; Ramos and Arnsten, 2007; Seamans and Yang, 2004; Spencer et al, 2015; Tritsch and Sabatini, 2012). Nevertheless, recent compelling evidence demonstrates that the functional interaction between NE and DA exerts powerful biological effects by activating converging synaptic pathways in PFC circuitry; however this interaction has yet to be well characterized.…”
Section: The Roles Ne and Da Play In Regulating Prefrontal Synaptimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that disruption of the excitation/inhibition balance in the PFC has been associated with many aforementioned psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (Krause et al, 2013; Lisman, 2012; Winterer and Weinberger, 2004; Yizhar et al, 2011) and ADHD (Moll et al, 2003; Pouget et al, 2009; Won et al, 2011), the individual actions as well as cooperative effects of both transmitters on synaptic transmission, intracellular signaling, and neuronal integration within immature and mature PFC circuitry are thus critical for the execution of prefrontal functions. How NE and DA, individually or synergistically, activate their respective receptors and the effects this on prefrontal functioning at the cellular, physiological, and behavioral level has been well-studied and reviewed in the past (Arnsten, 2011; Arnsten and Pliszka, 2011; Arnsten et al, 2015a; Arnsten et al, 2012b; Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003; Berridge and Arnsten, 2013; Brennan and Arnsten, 2008; Clark and Noudoost, 2014; Puig et al, 2014; Ramos and Arnsten, 2007; Seamans and Yang, 2004; Spencer et al, 2015; Tritsch and Sabatini, 2012). Nevertheless, recent compelling evidence demonstrates that the functional interaction between NE and DA exerts powerful biological effects by activating converging synaptic pathways in PFC circuitry; however this interaction has yet to be well characterized.…”
Section: The Roles Ne and Da Play In Regulating Prefrontal Synaptimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…133,134 Similarly, either too little or too much DA D1R stimulation erodes delay cell firing. 135,136 High levels of both NE and DA are released in the PFC during stress, rapidly taking PFC “off-line” to switch control of behavior to more primitive circuits that mediate habitual responses 33 (Figure 1B). Thus, the stress-induced impairments in PFC neuronal firing and working memory performance can be mimicked by stimulating α 1-AR or D1R in PFC and can be prevented by blocking these receptors.…”
Section: Dynamic Network Connectivity Of Dlpfc Layer Iii: Unique Neurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assessed with a number of tasks including the Stop-Signal Task (SST) and the Go/No-Go task (Eagle, Bari, & Robbins, 2008). Working memory refers to the ability to keep in mind an event that had just been experienced or to retrieve information from long-term memory storage and manipulate this information or use this information to regulate behavior (Arnsten, Wang, & Paspalas, 2015). There are many measures of working memory including auditory or visuo-spatial span tasks, which require information to be kept in mind while it is actively updated or manipulated.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Models Of Addictionmentioning
confidence: 99%