2024
DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2024.9.1.3118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping Effects and Relationship between Energy Band Gaps, Impact of Ionization Coefficient and Light Absorption Coefficient in Semiconductors

Md. Bappi Pramanik,
Md. Abdullah Al Rakib,
Md. Abubakor Siddik
et al.

Abstract: The doping process is very important in semiconductor technology that is widely used in the production of electronic devices. The effects of doping on the resistivity, mobility and energy band gap of semiconductors are significant and can greatly impact the performance of electronic devices. This thesis aims to investigate the impact of doping on the resistivity, mobility, energy band gap, impact of ionization coefficient, and light absorption coefficient of semiconductors. The study involves an in-depth analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bappi et al have reported that doping induces scattering centers. 71 Heavy doping induced more scattering centers (increased charge carrier density) which increased the energy barrier at the electrode–electrolyte interface giving rise to an increase in R ct and reduced mobility of charge carriers which is also confirmed by EIS and I – V measurements respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bappi et al have reported that doping induces scattering centers. 71 Heavy doping induced more scattering centers (increased charge carrier density) which increased the energy barrier at the electrode–electrolyte interface giving rise to an increase in R ct and reduced mobility of charge carriers which is also confirmed by EIS and I – V measurements respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…88,89 Additionally, high doping leads to more scattering centers which also resists the charge transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface. 90…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%