2010
DOI: 10.1021/nn100962r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping of Alkali, Alkaline-Earth, and Transition Metals in Covalent-Organic Frameworks for Enhancing CO2 Capture by First-Principles Calculations and Molecular Simulations

Abstract: We use the multiscale simulation approach, which combines the first-principles calculations and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations, to comprehensively study the doping of a series of alkali (Li, Na, and K), alkaline-earth (Be, Mg, and Ca), and transition (Sc and Ti) metals in nanoporous covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and the effects of the doped metals on CO 2 capture. The results indicate that, among all the metals studied, Li, Sc, and Ti can bind with COFs stably, while Be, Mg, and Ca cannot, becau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
184
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mitigate the effect of global warming, many porous materials, such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [5][6][7][8][9], porous co-ordination polymers [10,11], porous carbons [12][13][14][15][16], porous organic polymers (POPs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [17][18][19][20], have been investigated for CO 2 storage. In recent years, many amine functionalized or nitrogen-rich porous materials were found to show good CO 2 adsorption properties because of the existence of strong interactions between the nitrogen functionality and CO 2 molecules [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the effect of global warming, many porous materials, such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [5][6][7][8][9], porous co-ordination polymers [10,11], porous carbons [12][13][14][15][16], porous organic polymers (POPs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [17][18][19][20], have been investigated for CO 2 storage. In recent years, many amine functionalized or nitrogen-rich porous materials were found to show good CO 2 adsorption properties because of the existence of strong interactions between the nitrogen functionality and CO 2 molecules [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Motivated by these experimental and theoretical results, we synthesized hybrid MOF materials by using the two modification techniques outlined above, that is, 1) incorporation of CNTs into [Cu 3 (C 9 sites that become available for interaction with other molecules after removal of H 2 O in from Cu 2+ carbonyl complexes, and can also be easily rehydrated without change of the crystalline nature of the material after exposure to air [11] (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Although the btc ligand can not act as an electron receptor for the electron transfer from the naphthalenide radical anion, [7c] the rehydration of the Cu 2+ sites in the framework makes the electron transfer possible because of the strong nucleophilicity of lithium naphthalenide, which is the main reason for selecting this complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Most recently, the multiscale simulations performed by Lan et al indicate that Li is the best surface modifier of COFs for CO 2 capture among a series of metals (Li, Na, K, Be, Mg Ca, Sc and Ti). [9] Furthermore, their simulations show that the excess CO 2 uptakes of the lithium-doped COFs can be enhanced by four to eight times compared to the undoped COFs at 298 K and 1 bar. [9] Motivated by these experimental and theoretical results, we synthesized hybrid MOF materials by using the two modification techniques outlined above, that is, 1) incorporation of CNTs into [Cu 3 (C 9 sites that become available for interaction with other molecules after removal of H 2 O in from Cu 2+ carbonyl complexes, and can also be easily rehydrated without change of the crystalline nature of the material after exposure to air [11] (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBE0 and B3LYP), van der Waals DFT (vdW), and MP2 adsorption energy, E ads [16], and geometry optimization calculations. It is worth noticing that anthracene is structurally and chemically analogous to the organic bridging ligands found in metal-and covalentorganic frameworks, -MOF and COF-, thus our model conforms to a good representation of a promising class of CCS materials [7,[17][18][19][20]. We find that standard, hybrid and vdW functionals of DFT dramatically fail at reproducing CO 2 /AEM-C 14 H 10 interactions as evidenced by E ads discrepancies of ∼ 1 − 2 eV found with respect to MP2 calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%