1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb04742.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler Guided Extrathoracic Introducer Insertion

Abstract: Recent reports have raised concern over the use of standard subclavian puncture for placement of permanent pacing leads. This study reports the initial experience of one implanter in 59 consecutive, unselected patients undergoing implantation of a variety of pacing leads in whom a simple Doppler flow detector was used to guide extrathoracic venipuncture of the lateral subclavian/axillary vein. A total of 100 leads were placed for 48 right- and 11 left-sided systems. Lead insertion by this technique was success… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultrasound approach resulted in more back‐bleeding and significantly greater use of pressure dressings, but fortunately pocket hematomas were not more frequent. This increased back‐bleeding has been noted in other reports and attributed to less overlying tissue when compared with the standard subclavian site 10 . It is conceivable that the larger venotomy made by the retained guidewire technique contributed to back‐bleeding, but pressure dressings were not more common in two‐lead implants (48%) when compared with single‐lead implants (41%, P = 0.42) and the three pocket hematomas all occurred in single‐lead implants, where no guidewire was retained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The ultrasound approach resulted in more back‐bleeding and significantly greater use of pressure dressings, but fortunately pocket hematomas were not more frequent. This increased back‐bleeding has been noted in other reports and attributed to less overlying tissue when compared with the standard subclavian site 10 . It is conceivable that the larger venotomy made by the retained guidewire technique contributed to back‐bleeding, but pressure dressings were not more common in two‐lead implants (48%) when compared with single‐lead implants (41%, P = 0.42) and the three pocket hematomas all occurred in single‐lead implants, where no guidewire was retained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] However, the occurrence of pneumothorax or arterial injury was not completely avoided, for reasons that are not entirely clear. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of US-guided extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture, as well as elucidating the mechanism of the complications and the problems that need to be solved to improve outcomes in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fyke 69 has described use of an extrathoracic introducer insertion technique in 59 consecutive patients (total of 100 leads) with a simple Doppler flow detector. A sterile Doppler flow detector is moved along the clavicle.…”
Section: Axillary Venous Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%