2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: The Importance of the Nonapical Imaging Windows to Determine Severity in a Contemporary Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…De Monchy (7) utiliza únicamente el AV como criterio de severidad y describe un error de clasificación entre ápex y PED de 21% (17% de leve a moderada y 4% de moderada a severa). Thaden (8) , que también utiliza criterios de severidad por AV, describe una factibilidad del PED de 81% con obtención de los valores más altos en el 50%. Si solo se utiliza el enfoque apical hay 23% de error.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De Monchy (7) utiliza únicamente el AV como criterio de severidad y describe un error de clasificación entre ápex y PED de 21% (17% de leve a moderada y 4% de moderada a severa). Thaden (8) , que también utiliza criterios de severidad por AV, describe una factibilidad del PED de 81% con obtención de los valores más altos en el 50%. Si solo se utiliza el enfoque apical hay 23% de error.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La EA debe ser valorada desde diferentes enfoques (4)(5)(6) , pero son muy escasos los trabajos diseñados para cuantificar su impacto (7,8) . Las Sociedades Europeas de Ecocardiografía y de Imagen Cardiovascular y la Sociedad Americana de Ecocardiografía aconsejan, para la valoración de la estenosis aórtica (9,10) , la utilización del transductor Pedof cuando se interroga el enfoque PED.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Optimal alignment of the continuous wave Doppler beam with the direction of the aortic flow jet is crucial to accurately quantify aortic valve gradient, aortic valve area and thereby severity of AS. The apical window detects peak velocity in 40% of cases where as the right parasternal window picks up peak velocity in 50% of cases [23]. A multiwindow approach is recommended which includes apical, right parasternal, suprasternal and right supraclavicular windows.…”
Section: Echocardiographic Caveats In Estimating As Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thaden et al showed that in 100 consecutive patients with severe AS, the right parasternal window was superior for identifying maximal velocity. When sampling maximal velocity only from the apical window, nearly a quarter of patients were misclassified, of whom two-thirds were underestimated as moderate AS and one-third were misclassified from highgradient severe AS to low-gradient severe AS (14). Measurement of the LV outflow tract (LVOT) dimensions is measured in mid-systole at the same time in the cardiac cycle as the maximum LVOT velocity just below the insertion of the aortic valve leaflets (15), and it may have relatively high inter-observer variability (16).…”
Section: Severity Of Asmentioning
confidence: 99%