1990
DOI: 10.1086/169446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler imaging of the dwarf nova U Geminorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The O vi emission probably arises from irradiated turbulent gas around the hot spot, which, after the shock, shares the velocity of the gas stream and the accretion disk. This is identical to the Doppler maps of He ii 4686 and He i 4471 computed for the cataclysmic variable U Gem (Marsh et al 1990). …”
Section: No 2 2003 Bowen Fluorescence In X1822à371supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The O vi emission probably arises from irradiated turbulent gas around the hot spot, which, after the shock, shares the velocity of the gas stream and the accretion disk. This is identical to the Doppler maps of He ii 4686 and He i 4471 computed for the cataclysmic variable U Gem (Marsh et al 1990). …”
Section: No 2 2003 Bowen Fluorescence In X1822à371supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Both of the Balmer tomograms (H and H ) in Marsh et al (1990) show much more prominent stream emission (and comparatively much weaker disk emission) than do our Balmer tomograms. It is possible that we observed U Gem when its disk was especially bright (in H ) or the stream emission especially faint.…”
Section: Optical Tomogramsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Even though photon pileup of 30%-50% affects the count rate, a light curve (Fig. 2) constructed by phasing on the 4.25 hr binary period (using the ephemeris of Marsh et al 1990) reveals the usual dip at phase 0.8 that is evident in both outburst (L96) and quiescence (S96), as well as a second dip near phase 0.3 that is apparent in one of the past quiescent data sets (S96). Compensating for the pileup (which reduces the count rate difference between bright and faint features) yields a dip amplitude of $50%, close to that seen in the ASCA Solid-State Imaging Spectrometer (SIS) data (S96).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The list is worryingly short: only 10 systems (including SDSS J1006) satisfy our criteria, of which one is magnetic (DQ Her). The weighted mean and standard deviation of Gänsicke et al (2000); (4) Thorstensen (2000); (5) Feline et al (2005); (6) Marsh et al (1990); (7) Long & Gilliland (1999); (8) Naylor et al (2005); (9) Echevarría et al (2007); (10) Horne et al (1993); (11) Wood et al (2005); (12) Fiedler et al (1997); (13) Baptista et al (2000); (14) Baptista & Catalán (2001); (15) Thoroughgood et al (2005); (16) Thoroughgood et al (2004). the WD masses is 0.78 ± 0.19 M .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%