1951
DOI: 10.1086/145375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler-Shifted Auroral Hydrogen Emission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gartlein (1951) confirmed the observation and interpretation with detection of the H α , H β , and H γ lines. With greater resolution Meinel (1951) obtained spectra that clearly showed that precipitating protons of very high velocity are responsible for an extended short wavelength tail in the line profile. Eather and Jacka (1966) made measurements in the magnetic zenith and the magnetic horizon directions, noting that the H β line was broadened in both directions and that the zenith profile was shifted, in addition, toward shorter wavelengths.…”
Section: Ground-based Observations Of Auroral Hydrogen Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gartlein (1951) confirmed the observation and interpretation with detection of the H α , H β , and H γ lines. With greater resolution Meinel (1951) obtained spectra that clearly showed that precipitating protons of very high velocity are responsible for an extended short wavelength tail in the line profile. Eather and Jacka (1966) made measurements in the magnetic zenith and the magnetic horizon directions, noting that the H β line was broadened in both directions and that the zenith profile was shifted, in addition, toward shorter wavelengths.…”
Section: Ground-based Observations Of Auroral Hydrogen Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also provided the first evidence that aurorae were caused by particle precipitation. The presence of proton precipitation was later confirmed with higher spectral resolution of H emission measurements by Meinel (1951). Review papers on proton aurora include those by Eather (1967), McNeal andBirely (1973), Eather (1988), and Rees (1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A final concern about the existence of significant particle beams in solar flares comes from the absence of the effect described by Orrall and Zirker (1976). As originally proposed, this theory noted that a downward proton beam would produce an enhanced red wing on the Lyα line via charge exchange, analogous to the presence of Doppler-shifted Hα in the proton aurora (Meinel, 1951). This theory has never been tested well, but we have recently used EUV observations of the He II 304 Å line to look for the analogous effect resulting from primary α-particles , known from γ -ray observations to be present (Kozlovsky and Ramaty, 1974;Share and Murphy, 1997) in solar flares.…”
Section: To Beam or Not To Beam?mentioning
confidence: 99%