1968
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/19.3.583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dormancy in Seeds of Charlock: II. THE INFLUENCE OF THE SEED COAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirmed the reports by Corns (1960) and Holm and Miller (1972a\. However, Corns (1960) (Edwards 1968b;1969 …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results confirmed the reports by Corns (1960) and Holm and Miller (1972a\. However, Corns (1960) (Edwards 1968b;1969 …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results have been reported, in which GA applications partially relieved the inhibitory effect that O2 concentrations had on germination (Vamer 1964, Negbi et al 1966, Edwards 1968). Moreover, GA application could also relieve the inhibitory effect of low temperature in cotton (Cole and Wheeler 1974), pepper (Watkins and Cantliffe 1983), tomato (Groot and Karssen 1987), melon (Nelson andSharpies 1980, Edelstein andKigel 1990) and cucumber seeds (Sitnon et al 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This inhibitor is apparently produced by the seed coat (testa) (Witcombe, Hiliman and Whittington, 1969) and seems to be present in the seed coat of all seeds in apparently similar quantities (see Edwards, 1968a for a detailed description of seed anatomy). The inhibition is broken down by oxidation (Edwards, 1969) and the effect of the seed coat in dormant seed appears to be to prevent this oxidation taking place by being impermeable to oxygen (Edwards, 1968b). The seed coat is clearly of maternal origin and hence control of dormancy is maternal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%