Dört Kavite Dezenfektan Solüsyonunun Ve İki Farklı Lazer Sisteminin Dentin Adezivlerin Mikro Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkinliği

Abstract

The aim of this study, was to investigate the efficacy of four cavity disinfectant solutions and two different types of laser on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives as invitro. Methods: Seventy permanent human molar teeth were sectioned parallel to the occlusal surface to expose dentin in the midcoronal. The specimens were randomly divided into seven main groups (n=10) Then cavity disinfection procedures were applied; Saline(Control); Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl); Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX); Super-oxidized water (SPO); Aqueous ozone (AO); KTP laser; Er:YAG laser. Then the main groups were randomly divided into two subgroups as self-etch (Clearfil S 3 Bond Plus) and etch-and-rinse (Bisco All-Bond Universal) adhesive systems. Four cylinders of composite resin were applied to each bonded dentin surface using a tygon tube. The specimens were tested with universal testing machine. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Results: Statistical comparisons of the groups could be listed respectively from lowest to highest as; self-etch adhesive system, CHX<Control,AO,SPO<KTP<NaOCl<Er:YAG (p<0.05); etchand-rinse adhesive system, CHX<Control=AO=SPO<KTP< Er:YAG<NaOCl (p<0.05). When adhesive systems were compared with each other; there were found statistically significant differences within NaOCl groups, KTP laser groups and Er:YAG laser groups. Conclusions: Er:YAG and KTP laser systems may increase the bond strength of both adhesive systems compared to CHX, SPO and AO. Therefore, both of laser systems may advisable for cavity disinfection in restorative dentistry.

Electrolysed oxidising water as a multi‐purpose biocide in dental healthcare—A scoping review

“…Post‐immersion colour changes and precipitate formation in conventional gutta‐percha points and chlorhexidine‐impregnated, active points over 21 days was also investigated 162 . One study compared the residual effects of cavity disinfection on the micro‐shear bond strength of dentine adhesive systems (self‐etch, and etch‐and‐bond) to dentine samples treated either by various cavity disinfectant solutions (RTU moderately‐acidic EOW (50 ppm), aqueous ozone (8 ppm), 2% CHX, 5.25% NaOCl) or laser application (KTP laser, Er:YAG laser) 163 …”

“…Fourteen reports 107,[109][110][111][112]128,[157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164] investigated the effects of EOW on dental biomaterial properties (Table 3, Table S1). One study 62 reported on the rusting of carbon steel burs immersed in different EOW solutions (acidic, moderately acidic and neutral pH) at [HOCl] >100 mg/L.…”

“…107,164 Eight studies measured the effects of EOW treatment on the performance-related properties of restorative and prosthetic dental materials. 107,[109][110][111]157,159,162,163 The potential for corrosion or oxidation following immersion in acidic, neutral and basic EOW (POU and RTU) on steel dental burs was investigated in one study, 62 on metal denture alloys in two studies, one using POU acidic 157 and the second comparing acidic, moderately acidic and neutral EOWs. 159 One study evaluated the metal dissolution of orthodontic brackets after immersion in neutral POU EOW.…”

“…162 One study compared the residual effects of cavity disinfection on the micro-shear bond strength of dentine adhesive systems (self-etch, and etch-and-bond) to dentine samples treated either by various cavity disinfectant solutions (RTU moderately-acidic EOW (50 ppm), aqueous ozone (8 ppm), 2% CHX, 5.25% NaOCl) or laser application (KTP laser, Er:YAG laser). 163 The cost-effectiveness of POU EOW added to DUWL supply water via a centralised system in a dental hospital setting, compared to that for two hydrogen peroxide-based decentralised chair-side systems, has been reported. 165 None of the included reports on RTU neutral-pH EOW investigated its stability (shelf-life), antimicrobial effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for any dental healthcare applications as related to community or individual care settings where smaller volumes are required.…”