Dose area product measurement for diagnostic reference levels and analysis of patient dose in dental radiography

Han, Su-Chul; Lee, Boram; Shin, Gwanjun; Choi, Jin-Young; Kim, Jungmin; Park, Changseo; Park, Hyok; Lee, Kisung; Kim, You-Hyun

doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr439

Cited by 22 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En un ensayo realizado por Hans (2012), se presentaron diferencias en las dosis utilizadas de acuerdo con el fabricante en todos los exámenes de radiografía intraoral, pero no se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a las dosis utilizadas en radiografía extraoral, específicamente la radiografía panorámica (27).…”

Section: Rayos X En Odontología Consideraciones Generalesunclassified

“…Existen diferencias en las dosis utilizadas para radiografía dental, que dependen del tipo de procedimiento, si es extraoral o intraoral, en estas últimas influye la localización del diente y si la arcada es superior o inferior (27) Diente incisivo maxilar 36,5 (27) Diente premolar maxilar 46 (27) Diente molar maxilar 55,5 (27) Radiografía extraoral mGy mm (miligrays por milímetro) mGy cm 2 (miligrays por centímetro cuadrado)…”

Section: Dosis De Rayos X En Odontologíaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Uso controlado de los rayos X en la práctica odontológica

Amador¹,

González-Martínez²,

Sir-Mendoza³

2015

Rev. Cienc. Salud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contribuir de manera informativa y crítica con la promoción del uso controlado de los rayos X durante la práctica odontológica. Introducción: El ejercicio de la práctica odontológica como servicio de atención en salud requiere del uso de herramientas complementarias para el adecuado diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento en pacientes ante diferentes condiciones clínicas. Por lo cual, el uso de radiografías por odontólogos es frecuente y de mucha utilidad; sin embargo, la exposición continua a radiaciones por parte del paciente y el profesional o estudiante del área odontológica implica un riesgo para la salud, aunque muchas veces se le resta importancia a esta exposición en lo referente a efectos visibles para la salud, por considerarse que son dosis muy bajas como para generar efectos biológicos significativos. Conclusión: En profesionales y estudiantes de odontología, es necesario considerar el riesgo de dosis acumulativas por exposición continua y, en pacientes, hay la posibilidad de sinergismo con otras radiaciones, a las cuales se pueden exponer por atención en otras áreas de la salud. Por esto se hace necesario promover el uso adecuado de los rayos X por el personal de la salud, siendo conscientes de la necesidad de afianzar el conocimiento sobre los aspectos básicos que conllevan a la disminución del riesgo de efectos biológicos a partir de su uso adecuado en la atención odontológica. Palabras clave: Rayos x, relación dosis-respuesta, ADN, pruebas de micronúcleos, personal de odontología, atención al paciente (DeCS-Bireme).

show abstract

Section: Rayos X En Odontología Consideraciones Generalesunclassified

Section: Dosis De Rayos X En Odontologíaunclassified

Uso controlado de los rayos X en la práctica odontológica

Amador¹,

González-Martínez²,

Sir-Mendoza³

2015

Rev. Cienc. Salud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous models of equipment are in existence, 2 and there is evidence of widespread use in some countries. 3,4 Clinical guidelines are a means of providing a framework for the use of a new technology or technique. Guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to assist the clinician and patient in making decisions about appropriate healthcare for certain specific clinical circumstances.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review

Horner¹,

O’Malley²,

Taylor³

et al. 2015

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To identify guidelines on the clinical use of CBCT in dental and maxillofacial radiology, in particular selection criteria, to consider how they were produced, to appraise their quality objectively and to compare their recommendations. Methods: A literature search using MEDLINE (Ovid ® ) was undertaken prospectively from 1 January 2000 to identify published material classifiable as "guidelines" pertaining to the use of CBCT in dentistry. This was supplemented by searches on websites, an internet search engine, hand searching of theses and by information from personal contacts. Quality assessment of publications was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Publications were examined for areas of agreement and disagreement. Results: 26 publications were identified, 11 of which were specifically written to give guidelines on the clinical use of CBCT and contained sections on selection criteria. The remainder were a heterogeneous mixture of publications that included guidelines relating to CBCT. Two had used a formal evidence-based approach for guideline development and two used consensus methods. The quality of publications was frequently low as assessed using AGREE II, with many lacking evidence of adequate methodology. There was broad agreement between publications on clinical use, apart from treatment planning, in implant dentistry. Conclusions: Reporting of guideline development is often poorly presented. Guideline development panels should aim to perform and report their work using the AGREE II instrument as a template to raise standards and avoid the risk of suspicions of bias.

show abstract

“…치과 X선 검사에서의 환자선량 권고 량 마련 연구 [3] 등 권고 선량 개발을 진행하고 있으며, Lee et al [4] , Ha n et al [5] , Choi [6] , Jeong et al [7] 선량 저감율은 식 2와 같다. 대해서는 아직 권고선량을 제시하지 않았다 [14] .…”

unclassified

Study on Research for Reducing Radiation Dose of Head and Neck for Cephalometric Radiography System

Oh¹,

Shin²,

Lee³

2016

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, the interest in the orthodontic treatment for children is increased by a rise in national income level. The number of cephalometric radiography that could diagnose a malocclusion and malposition between teeth and jawbone increased. It required attention to radiation exposure, because the subject of dental examination is children which are more sensitive to radiation and the head and neck, the object of that include radiation sensitive organ such as the thyroid, bone marrow, eyes, salivary gland, and so on. In this study, we measured two-dimensional dose distribution in cephalometric radiography system (VATEC Pax-400C) using Agfa CP-G Plus film and MagicMax Dosimeter, and calculated radiation organ dose of head and neck through MCNPX simulation. And then we designed a radiation protective device to decrease radiation dose. The dose distribution of the cephalometric radiography system irradiated the head and neck overall as well as the oral and maxillofacial parts. The radiation organ dose calculated that thyroid, oesophagus and eyes are irradiated high, and the radiation organ dose decreased about 70 ~ 80% by the application of the radiation protective device. The results of this study will be used construction of database for dental radiation exposure and research of reducing radiation dose.

show abstract

Dose area product measurement for diagnostic reference levels and analysis of patient dose in dental radiography

Cited by 22 publications

References 9 publications

Uso controlado de los rayos X en la práctica odontológica

Uso controlado de los rayos X en la práctica odontológica

Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review

Study on Research for Reducing Radiation Dose of Head and Neck for Cephalometric Radiography System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About